京津冀协同发展的核心驱动力是协同创新。在新时期,区域协同创新呈现共生演化的特征。借鉴生态学理论构建“态”—“势”—“流”的三维度创新生态位区域协同创新理论框架和综合评价体系,对京津冀区域协同创新进行测度分析。研究结果表明:京津冀协同创新水平整体呈现波动上升趋势,协同创新取得了显著进展,但城市间发展差距较大。系统创新态、创新势和创新流呈现波动性增长,其中创新流对系统协同创新的贡献较小。京津冀协同创新模式经历了从单利共生向差异互利共生的演进过程,当前处于差异互利共生向均衡互利共生的演化阶段。应进一步巩固协同创新基础,聚焦三地间价值共创,充分发挥协同创新溢出效应。同时,应加快建设更加开放的创新生态,致力于建成协同创新共同体,打造全国创新驱动增长新引擎。
Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei synergistic development is fundamentally driven by collaborative innovation. In the new period, regional collaborative innovation shows the trend of symbiotic evolution. Drawing on ecological theory, we constructs a theoretical framework and a comprehensive evaluation system for regional collaborative innovation in the three-dimensional ecological niche of “state”, “potential” and “flow”, and measures and analyses the level of collaborative innovation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The results show that the level of regional collaborative innovation has shown a fluctuating rise, and significant progress has been made in collaborative innovation, but there is a large development gap between cities. The system innovation state, innovation potential and innovation flow all show fluctuating growth, and the contribution of innovation flow to system collaborative innovation is relatively small. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative innovation model has experienced a change from mono-beneficial symbiosis to differential mutually beneficial symbiosis, and is currently in the evolutionary stage from differential mutually beneficial symbiosis model to balanced mutually beneficial symbiosis. In the future, we should further consolidate the foundation of collaborative innovation, focus on the value co-creation of the three places, give full play to the spillover effect of collaborative innovation, accelerate the construction of a more open innovation ecosystem, strive to build a collaborative innovation community, and create a new engine for national innovation-driven growth.
[1] 以更加奋发有为的精神状态推进各项工作推动京津冀协同发展不断迈上新台阶[N]. 人民日报,2023-05-13(001)
[2] Fritscha M, Frankeb G. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J]. Research Policy, 2004(33):245-255
[3] 刘娟,马学礼.雄安新区创新驱动发展实现路径研究——创新生态系统视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018 (8):32-37
[4] 曾国屏,苟尤钊,刘磊.从“创新系统”到“创新生态系统”[J].科学学研究,2013 (1):4-12
[5] Veronica S, Thomas F. Collaborative innovation in ubiquitous systems[J]. International Manufacturing, 2007(18):599-615
[6] 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012 (2):161-164
[7] 周开国,卢允之,杨海生.融资约束、创新能力与企业协同创新[J].经济研究,2017 (7):94-108
[8] 余泳泽.中国区域创新活动的“协同效应”与“挤占效应”——基于创新价值链视角的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(10):37-52
[9] Lopolito A, Falcone P M, Sica E. The role of proximity in sustainability transitions: A technological niche evolution analysis[J]. Research Policy, 2022(55):104464
[10] 孙大明,原毅军.空间外溢视角下的协同创新与区域产业升级[J].统计研究,2019 (10):100-114
[11] 徐紫嫣,姚战琪,夏杰长.协同集聚对出口技术复杂度的影响研究——基于区域创新中介效应检验[J].经济纵横,2021(9):43-52
[12] 梁婉君,何平.京津冀区域协同创新监测系统研究——兼与长三角区域协同创新比较[J].统计研究,2022(3):132-141
[13] 赵成伟,张孟辉,李文雅,等.京津冀协同创新机制探讨——基于主体协同与区域协同视角[J].中国科技论坛,2023(12):116-124
[14] 王璐瑶,曲冠楠,陈劲.面向京津冀协同发展的“协同创新生态系统”构建:现状、模式与瞻望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024 (2):51-63
[15] 李国平.以国际科技创新中心建设支撑首都高质量发展[J].城市问题,2022(12):13-18
[16] Xuemei Xie, Hongwei Wang.How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems[J].Journal of Business Research, 2021(124):299-311
[17] 苏屹,林周周,欧忠辉. 知识流动对区域创新活动两阶段的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2020(7): 100-109
[18] 张贵,温科,宋新平,等. 创新生态系统:理论与实践[M].北京:经济管理出版社, 2018: 42
[19] 许庆瑞,吴志岩,陈力田.转型经济中企业自主创新能力演化路径及驱动因素分析——海尔集团1984—2013年的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2013(4):121-134,188
[20] 苏屹,林周周,欧忠辉. 知识流动对区域创新活动两阶段的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2020 (7): 100-109
[21] 张贵,刘雪芹. 创新生态系统作用机理及演化研究——基于生态场视角的解释[J].软科学, 2016 (12): 16-19,42
[22] 袁纯清. 共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(下)[J].改革, 1998(3):11
[23] 王庆金,田善武.区域创新系统共生演化路径及机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2016(12):108-113
[24] 毛磊.开放式理论下跨区域协同交互式创新研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014 (24):25-28
[25] 王庆金,田善武.区域创新系统共生演化路径及机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2016(12):108-113
[26] 刘娟,马学礼.雄安新区创新驱动发展实现路径研究——创新生态系统视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018 (8):32-37
