In the face of the escalating complexity of modern cities and the growing need for sophisticated governance, the efficient provision of digital infrastructure in the development of smart communities has emerged as a pivotal cornerstone for advancing the profound growth of urban areas. However, practical challenges, including inadequate data integration, intricate interest coordination, deficient information communication, and convoluted compliance procedures, have resulted in a substantial number of concealed transaction costs. These costs, in turn, impede the advancement and efficacy of smart community construction. Addressing the query of how to effectively diminish transaction costs in cooperative supply through institutional design, this study formulated a transaction cost-based analytical framework. Through a comparative analysis of three representative cases in G City and treating the collaborative supply of digital infrastructure as a systematic transactional process, the research delves into methods for reducing uncertainty in collaborative processes through institutional design involving multiple entities. Findings indicate that transaction costs in cooperative supply can be mitigated by: clarifying data sharing standards, implementing interest negotiation mechanisms, enhancing information transmission methods, and optimizing compliance rules and procedures. Consequently, this study offers a replicable and widely applicable blueprint for the construction of smart communities in other mega-cities.
ZHANG Hui
,
SHEN Shang-xian
,
ZHAI La
. Research on collaborative supply of digital infrastructure for smart community construction: Analysis from the perspective of transaction cost[J]. Urban Problems, 2023
, 340(11)
: 75
-83
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.231108
[1] 杨雅厦.智慧社区建设对公共服务供给模式的变革及其优化研究[J].中国行政管理,2018(11):151-153
[2] 臧乃康.新公共管理与政府治理成本[J].政治与法律,2004(5):32-39
[3] 葛天任,裴琳娜.高风险社会的智慧社区建设与敏捷治理变革[J].理论与改革,2020(5):85-96
[4] 刘艳红,黄雪涛,石博涵.中国“新基建”:概念、现状与问题[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(6):1-12
[5] 王雨辰.“新基建”视域下的基础设施供给方式研究[J].经济体制改革,2021(5):194-200
[6] 王欢明.“草根”驱动的公共服务合作生产及其机制——基于S市Y街道微基建PPP改造的案例分析[J].中国行政管理,2022(4):27-35
[7] 吴旭红.智慧社区建设何以可能？——基于整合性行动框架的分析[J].公共管理学报,2020(4):110-125,173
[8] 冯静.公共服务合作供给的中层理论述评[J].湖北社会科学,2019(12):39-45
[9] 何继新,贾慧,李莹.社区公共物品网络治理冲突:内涵归因、理论属性与结构框架[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2019(1):79-87
[10] 孙朝阳.社区建设中的物品供给:制度困境及其对策[J].政治学研究,2007(3):94-98
[11] 吴旭红,何瑞.智慧社区建设中的行动者、利益互动与统合策略:基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2019(6):80-94,126-127
[12] 胡建华,钟刚华.“合作-交易”:地方政府跨区域公共危机协同治理机制研究[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):115-122
[13] 罗文剑,郭镇国.城市社区治理交易成本影响因素的理论阐释[J].学习论坛,2020(11):70-76
[14] 王成,李东阳,周玉萍.社区智慧养老服务供给——责任网络、现实约束与机制构建[J].人口与经济,2023(1):120-138
[15] 吴昺兵,贾康.政府与市场合作供给公共产品的理论分析和制度设计[J].江西社会科学,2023(5):157-171,208
[16] 道格拉斯·C·诺斯著,杭行译.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].格致出版社,2014:32-42
[17] 张五常.交易费用的范式[J].社会科学战线,1999(1):1-9
[18] 周燕.政府的合约性质及其经济治理——基于中国地方政府若干实践的交易费用考察[J].管理世界,2017(8):81-94
[19] Coase R H. The Nature of the Firm[J]. Economica, 1937 (16):386-405
[20] Williamson O E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991: 269-296
[21] 陈宇峰,胡晓群.国家、社群与转型期中国农村公共产品的供给——一个交易成本政治学的研究视角[J].财贸经济,2007(1):63-69
[22] 卢现祥,卢巧玲.新制度经济学[M].北京大学出版社,2021:58-70
[23] 许鹿,黄未.资产专用性:政府跨部门数据共享困境的形成缘由[J].东岳论丛,2021(8):126-135
[24] 易轩宇.合作治理模式下社会组织参与社会治理博弈分析[J].兰州学刊,2015(3):180-187
[25] 符刚,刘春华,林万祥.信息成本:国内外研究现状及述评[J].情报杂志,2007(11):83-86
[26] 李哲,陈子韬,吴建南.“一网通办”何以降低企业制度性交易成本？——基于上海市A区高新技术企业认定的探索性研究[J].行政论坛,2021(5):115-121
