The potential risks of the construction of intelligent elderly care and its avoidance strategies

  • YUAN Wen-quan ,
  • WANG Zhi-xin
Expand

Received date: 2023-10-16

  Revised date: 2023-12-20

  Online published: 2024-02-04

Abstract

The road to the construction of smart elderly care is accompanied by indirect effects of potential risks. Based on the perspective of the whole life cycle and the use of stage analysis, the paper systematically, dynamically and comprehensively discusses the different risk patterns faced by the construction of smart elderly care in each stage. The research finds that the risks in the planning and design stage of the construction of smart elderly care include the orientation of value technology, the homogenization of target positioning, the deviation of management decision and the lag of system rules. The risks in the construction implementation stage include the divergence of main interests, the virtual social participation, the polarization of resource elements and the lack of standards and norms. The risks in operation and maintenance stage include responsibility distribution idling, intelligent technology alienation and social ethics anomie. On this basis, it is proposed to shape the risk prevention principle, build a multiple co-governance model, improve the rule system and supervision system, establish information interaction and risk decision-making mechanism, establish the governance responsibility system and clarify the construction standards and evaluation system of risk avoidance strategies, and then effectively promote the construction process of smart elderly care.

Cite this article

YUAN Wen-quan , WANG Zhi-xin . The potential risks of the construction of intelligent elderly care and its avoidance strategies[J]. Urban Problems, 2024 , 342(1) : 84 -91 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.240109

References

[1] 金昱希,林闽钢.智慧化养老服务的革新路径与中国选择[J].兰州大学学报(社会科学版),2021(5):107-116
[2] 代利凤.智慧养老综合体服务:缘起、风险与政策应对[J].广西社会科学,2019(10):66-70
[3] 朱海龙,唐辰明.智慧养老的社会风险与法律制度安排[J]吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2020(5):27-36
[4] 王张华,贺文媛.智慧养老的伦理风险及其消解[J].天津行政学院学报,2021(6):45-54
[5] 武萍,朱旭峰.智慧养老服务的风险规制与秩序建构[J].新疆社会科学,2022(6):153-166
[6] 杜孝珍,孙婧娜.我国虚拟养老院发展的优势、风险及路径[J].上海行政学院学报,2020(4):74-85
[7] 唐辰明.人工智能法律人格问题的思考[J].云南社会科学,2019(6):120-127
[8] 蔡小慎,田宇晶.基于行为人模型的智慧养老模式合作机制分析[J].理论导刊,2017(5):13-19
[9] 马长山.人工智能的社会风险及其法律规制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2018(6):47-55
[10] 陈友华,邵文君.智慧养老:内涵、困境与建议[J].江淮论坛,2021(2):139-145
[11] 魏蒙.中国智慧养老的定位、不足与发展对策[J].理论学刊,2021(3):143-149
[12] 马长山.智慧社会的治理难题及其消解[J].求是学刊,2019(5):91-98
[13] 王健,林津如.护理机器人补位子女养老的伦理风险及其防范[J].道德与文明,2019(3):131-137
[14] 朱海龙.智慧养老:中国老年照护模式的革新与思考[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2016(3):68-73
[15] 李梅,汤志伟.中国智慧社会建设的风险表现、分析及防范研究[J].电子政务,2019(4):27-34
[16] 朱敏丽,邓彦平.法律与伦理视域下智慧养老的国际治理经验及启示[J].社会保障研究,2023(4):85-92
[17] 粟丹.我国智慧养老模式的法律特征及其制度需求——以智慧养老政策为中心的考察[J].江汉学术,2018(6):50-59
[18] 赵莹.风险社会视阈下物联网金融监管制度构建[J].贵州社会科学,2019(8):131-137
[19] 睢党臣,曹献雨.芬兰精准化养老服务体系建设的经验及启示[J].经济纵横,2018(6):116-123
[20] Goh M Y, Case K, Elsaadi R, et al. Deployment of assisted living technology using intelligent body sensors platform for elderly people health monitoring[J]. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering,2016(3):219-224
[21] 日本国土交通省.高齢者の居住の安定確保に関する法律[EB/OL]. https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk7_000016.html,2023-12-19
[22] 赵庚,赵萌.智慧养老评价指标体系研究[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1):88-94
Outlines

/

〈 〉