Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei synergistic development is fundamentally driven by collaborative innovation. In the new period, regional collaborative innovation shows the trend of symbiotic evolution. Drawing on ecological theory, we constructs a theoretical framework and a comprehensive evaluation system for regional collaborative innovation in the three-dimensional ecological niche of “state”, “potential” and “flow”, and measures and analyses the level of collaborative innovation in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. The results show that the level of regional collaborative innovation has shown a fluctuating rise, and significant progress has been made in collaborative innovation, but there is a large development gap between cities. The system innovation state, innovation potential and innovation flow all show fluctuating growth, and the contribution of innovation flow to system collaborative innovation is relatively small. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative innovation model has experienced a change from mono-beneficial symbiosis to differential mutually beneficial symbiosis, and is currently in the evolutionary stage from differential mutually beneficial symbiosis model to balanced mutually beneficial symbiosis. In the future, we should further consolidate the foundation of collaborative innovation, focus on the value co-creation of the three places, give full play to the spillover effect of collaborative innovation, accelerate the construction of a more open innovation ecosystem, strive to build a collaborative innovation community, and create a new engine for national innovation-driven growth.
ZHANG Gui
,
SUN Jian-hua
. Generation mechanism, evaluation and countermeasures of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei collaborative innovation community:A new interpretation of regional innovation based on ecological perspective[J]. Urban Problems, 2024
, 343(2)
: 18
-27
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.240203
[1] 以更加奋发有为的精神状态推进各项工作推动京津冀协同发展不断迈上新台阶[N]. 人民日报,2023-05-13(001)
[2] Fritscha M, Frankeb G. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation[J]. Research Policy, 2004(33):245-255
[3] 刘娟,马学礼.雄安新区创新驱动发展实现路径研究——创新生态系统视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018 (8):32-37
[4] 曾国屏,苟尤钊,刘磊.从“创新系统”到“创新生态系统”[J].科学学研究,2013 (1):4-12
[5] Veronica S, Thomas F. Collaborative innovation in ubiquitous systems[J]. International Manufacturing, 2007(18):599-615
[6] 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012 (2):161-164
[7] 周开国,卢允之,杨海生.融资约束、创新能力与企业协同创新[J].经济研究,2017 (7):94-108
[8] 余泳泽.中国区域创新活动的“协同效应”与“挤占效应”——基于创新价值链视角的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(10):37-52
[9] Lopolito A, Falcone P M, Sica E. The role of proximity in sustainability transitions: A technological niche evolution analysis[J]. Research Policy, 2022(55):104464
[10] 孙大明,原毅军.空间外溢视角下的协同创新与区域产业升级[J].统计研究,2019 (10):100-114
[11] 徐紫嫣,姚战琪,夏杰长.协同集聚对出口技术复杂度的影响研究——基于区域创新中介效应检验[J].经济纵横,2021(9):43-52
[12] 梁婉君,何平.京津冀区域协同创新监测系统研究——兼与长三角区域协同创新比较[J].统计研究,2022(3):132-141
[13] 赵成伟,张孟辉,李文雅,等.京津冀协同创新机制探讨——基于主体协同与区域协同视角[J].中国科技论坛,2023(12):116-124
[14] 王璐瑶,曲冠楠,陈劲.面向京津冀协同发展的“协同创新生态系统”构建:现状、模式与瞻望[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024 (2):51-63
[15] 李国平.以国际科技创新中心建设支撑首都高质量发展[J].城市问题,2022(12):13-18
[16] Xuemei Xie, Hongwei Wang.How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems[J].Journal of Business Research, 2021(124):299-311
[17] 苏屹,林周周,欧忠辉. 知识流动对区域创新活动两阶段的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2020(7): 100-109
[18] 张贵,温科,宋新平,等. 创新生态系统:理论与实践[M].北京:经济管理出版社, 2018: 42
[19] 许庆瑞,吴志岩,陈力田.转型经济中企业自主创新能力演化路径及驱动因素分析——海尔集团1984—2013年的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2013(4):121-134,188
[20] 苏屹,林周周,欧忠辉. 知识流动对区域创新活动两阶段的影响研究[J].科研管理, 2020 (7): 100-109
[21] 张贵,刘雪芹. 创新生态系统作用机理及演化研究——基于生态场视角的解释[J].软科学, 2016 (12): 16-19,42
[22] 袁纯清. 共生理论及其对小型经济的应用研究(下)[J].改革, 1998(3):11
[23] 王庆金,田善武.区域创新系统共生演化路径及机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2016(12):108-113
[24] 毛磊.开放式理论下跨区域协同交互式创新研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014 (24):25-28
[25] 王庆金,田善武.区域创新系统共生演化路径及机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2016(12):108-113
[26] 刘娟,马学礼.雄安新区创新驱动发展实现路径研究——创新生态系统视角[J].科技进步与对策,2018 (8):32-37
