Promoting innovation and development in old revolutionary base areas is a crucial mission for achieving coordinated regional development in the new era. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the government has continuously increased support for the revitalization and development of old revolutionary base areas, and has introduced a series of support policies to support the revitalization and development of old revolutionary base areas. What impact will these policies have on the innovative development of old revolutionary base areas? Based on the panel data of five key old revolutionary base areas from 2009 to 2020, the PSM-DID method was used to examine the impact and mechanism of national priority support policies on the innovation efficiency of old revolutionary base areas and explore the innovative development paths of old revolutionary base areas. The results show that the implementation of the national priority support policy has significantly improved the innovation efficiency of the old revolutionary base areas, and the conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. The mechanism research finds that the national priority support policy promotes the improvement of innovation efficiency old revolutionary base areas through three paths: increasing investment incentive effect, promoting industrial agglomeration and improving the level of informatization. The heterogeneity test shows that the policy effects of national priority support policies on cities with different characteristics of the old revolutionary base areas exhibit significant differences, meaning that the support policy effects are more pronounced in cities with lower levels of investment in science and education, industrialization, and location advantages. Therefore, further encouraging enterprises to increase investment, enhance industrial agglomeration effect and improve information infrastructure are important measures to enhance the innovation ability of the old revolutionary base areas. The implementation of differentiation strategy is conducive to improving the overall effect of the support policies of the old revolutionary base areas.
ZHANG Ming-lin
,
LI Ya-Nan
,
DENG Xin
. The influence of national priority support policies on innovation efficiency of old revolutionary base areas[J]. Urban Problems, 2024
, 343(2)
: 90
-101
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.240210
[1] 柳卸林,杨博旭,肖楠.我国区域创新能力变化的新特征、新趋势[J].中国科学院院刊,2021(1):54-63
[2] 袁航,朱承亮.国家高新区推动了中国产业结构转型升级吗[J].中国工业经济,2018(8):60-77
[3] 罗鸣令,范子英,陈晨.区域性税收优惠政策的再分配效应——来自西部大开发的证据[J].中国工业经济,2019(2):61-79
[4] 张明林,曾令铭.国家优先支持革命老区的政策效果及治理启示[J].中国行政管理,2020(6):92-96
[5] 李斌,杨冉,卢娟.中部崛起战略存在政策陷阱吗?——基于PSM-DID方法的经验证据[J].中国经济问题,2019(3):40-53
[6] 王春枝,赵国杰.基于非径向SE-C~2R模型与谱系聚类的中国区域创新效率分析[J].中国软科学,2015(11):68-80
[7] 兰海霞,赵雪雁.中国区域创新效率的时空演变及创新环境影响因素[J].经济地理,2020(2):97-107
[8] 王锐淇,彭良涛,蒋宁.基于SFA与Malmquist方法的区域技术创新效率测度与影响因素分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(9):121-128
[9] 白俊红,江可申,李婧.应用随机前沿模型评测中国区域研发创新效率[J].管理世界,2009(10):51-61
[10] 潘雄锋,刘凤朝.中国区域工业企业技术创新效率变动及其收敛性研究[J].管理评论,2010(2):59-64
[11] 白俊红,江可申,李婧.中国区域创新效率的收敛性分析[J].财贸经济,2008(9):119-123
[12] Lee C Y. The differential effects of public R&D support on firm R&D: Theory and evidence from multi-country data[J]. Technovation,2011(5-6):256-269
[13] 钟腾,罗吉罡,汪昌云.地方政府人才引进政策促进了区域创新吗?——来自准自然实验的证据[J].金融研究,2021(5):135-152
[14] 张宗益,张莹.创新环境与区域技术创新效率的实证研究[J].软科学,2008(12):123-127
[15] 李晨光,张永安.区域创新政策对企业创新效率影响的实证研究[J].科研管理,2014(9):25-35
[16] 余明桂,范蕊,钟慧洁.中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2016(12):5-22
[17] Yang H, Phelps C, Steensma H K. Learning from what others have learned from you: The effects of knowledge spillovers on originating firms[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010(2): 371-389
[18] 肖文,林高榜.政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J].管理世界,2014(4):71-80
[19] 刘瑞明,赵仁杰.西部大开发:增长驱动还是政策陷阱——基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(6):32-43
[20] 龚斌磊,张启正,袁菱苒,等.革命老区振兴发展的政策创新与效果评估[J].管理世界,2022(8):26-43
[21] 任保平,辛伟.以国家规划推进中国式现代化的历史演变、效果和经验[J].当代财经,2023(10):3-17
[22] 杨冕,谢泽宇,杨福霞.省界毗邻地区绿色发展路径探索:来自革命老区振兴的启示[J].世界经济,2022(8):157-179
[23] Gnyawali D R, Fogel D S. Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1994(4): 43-62
[24] 余泳泽,张少辉,杨晓章.税收负担与“大众创业、万众创新”——来自跨国的经验证据[J].经济管理,2017(6):162-177
[25] Marshall A. Principles of Economics London[M].Macmillan,1890:101-106
[26] Perroux F. Economic space: Theory and applications[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1950(1): 89-104
[27] 徐德英,韩伯棠.电商模式下区域创新绩效及空间溢出效应研究[J].科研管理,2016(11):107-118
[28] 孙早,徐远华.信息基础设施建设能提高中国高技术产业的创新效率吗?——基于2002—2013年高技术17个细分行业面板数据的经验分析[J].南开经济研究,2018(2):72-92
[29] Heckman J J, Ichimura H, Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator[J].The Review of Economic Studies,1998(2):261-294
[30] 余泳泽,刘大勇.我国区域创新效率的空间外溢效应与价值链外溢效应——创新价值链视角下的多维空间面板模型研究[J].管理世界,2013(7):6-20,70,187
[31] 吴延瑞.生产率对中国经济增长的贡献:新的估计[J].经济学(季刊),2008(3):827-842
[32] 安勇,原玉廷.土地财政、扭曲效应与区域创新效率[J].中国土地科学,2019(8):36-42,52
[33] 张明林,李华旭.国家优先支持政策促进绿色全要素生产率的效应评估——来自革命老区的经验证据[J].财经研究,2021(10):65-79
[34] 黄晓婷,孙久文,丁杰.金融综合改革试验区与创新型城市双试点的创新效应[J].城市问题,2023(2):49-60
[35] 孙伍琴,朱顺林.金融发展促进技术创新的效率研究——基于Malmuquist指数的分析[J].统计研究,2008(3):46-50
[36] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J].Biometrika,1983(1):41-55
[37] Jacobson L S, LaLonde R J, Sullivan D G. Earnings losses of displaced workers[J]. The American Economic Review, 1993(4): 685-709
[38] 白俊红,张艺璇,卞元超.创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2022(6):61-78
[39] 周迪,王明哲.改革迸活力:国家扶贫改革试验区政策的经济效应研究[J].中国农村观察,2019(6):127-144
[40] Qing Liu, Yi Lu. Firm investment and exporting: Evidence from China’s value-added tax reform[J].Journal of International Economics,2015(2):392-403
[41] 李政,杨思莹.创新型城市试点提升城市创新水平了吗?[J]. 经济学动态,2019(8):70-85
[42] 盛丰.生产性服务业集聚与制造业升级:机制与经验——来自230个城市数据的空间计量分析[J].产业经济研究,2014 (2):32-39
[43] 黄利梅.企业知识型员工激励边际递减效用的优化策略探究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2018(1):20-23
