Study on the administrative division adjustment policies and the coordinated development of towns under the background of “the Belt and Road” initiative: Taking the northwest border area of China as an example

  • NI Wei-qiu ,
  • SUN Jun ,
  • TANG Qun-li
Expand

Received date: 2024-03-11

  Revised date: 2024-04-12

  Online published: 2024-05-15

Abstract

Since the implementation of the “the Belt and Road” initiative, Overlapping the effects of administrative division adjustment policies, the coordinated development of towns in the border area has steadily improved. However, there are also many problems, especially the differences in the role of border administrative division adjustments in promoting the coordinated development of various subsystems in urban areas. This article constructs a measurement index system for coordinated urban development in the northwest border area, and applies entropy method and coupling coordination degree model to measure the comprehensive development level of urban population, economy, and social environment subsystems in the northwest border area from 2006 to 2019. It analyzes the impact of administrative division adjustment on coordinated urban development. The results show that the adjustment of administrative divisions accelerates the concentration of border population to cities, promotes the allocation of resources, and forms a large-scale urban spatial pattern; The harmonious development index and the comprehensive development level of each sub-system of the northwestern border towns show a steady and increasing trend, and there is a positive correlation between the adjustment of administrative divisions and the harmonious development of urban. The coordinated development index of urban in western Xinjiang, southern Xinjiang and Northern Xinjiang decreased successively. Among the three regions, the coordinated development of urban in western Xinjiang was the highest, and the coordinated development of cities and towns in northern Xinjiang was the lowest.

Cite this article

NI Wei-qiu , SUN Jun , TANG Qun-li . Study on the administrative division adjustment policies and the coordinated development of towns under the background of “the Belt and Road” initiative: Taking the northwest border area of China as an example[J]. Urban Problems, 2024 , 345(4) : 65 -72 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.240406

References

[1] 杨亚雄.西北边境地区深度融入“丝绸之路经济带”建设的路径探析——以新疆边境地区为例[J].天水师范学院学报,2021(1):115-122
[2] 黄征学.加快边境地区发展的基本思路[J].中国经贸导刊,2013(19):33-35
[3] 王晓晓,周颖,陆宇婷.行政区划调整对城镇协调发展的影响研究——以苏锡常地区为例[J].现代城市研究,2022(12):34-43
[4] 王开泳,冯润东.行政区划调整对政区位势的影响与定量化测度[J].地理学报,2020(8):1617-1632
[5] 罗震东.改革开放以来中国城市行政区划变更特征及趋势[J].城市问题, 2008(6): 77-82
[6] 殷洁,罗小龙.从撤县设区到区界重组:我国区县级行政区划调整的新趋势[J].城市规划, 2013(6): 9-15
[7] 王开泳,陈田.“十四五”时期行政区划设置与空间治理的探讨[J].中国科学院院刊, 2020(7): 867- 874
[8] 孟贵,王开泳,王甫园,等.中国行政区划研究30年:进展、启示与展望[J].地理科学进展,2023(5):982-997
[9] 张可云,李晨.新中国70年行政区划调整的历程、特征与展望[J].社会科学辑刊,2021(1):118-128
[10] 何斌. 关于省直管县体制的可行性研究[D].湖南大学,2007
[11] 詹新宇,曾傅雯.行政区划调整提升经济发展质量了吗?——来自“撤县设区”的经验证据[J].财贸研究,2021(4):70-82
[12] 李克萌,陈风云.行政区划调整促进了县域经济增长吗?——来自乡镇撤并的经验证据[J].中国集体经济,2020(8):2-4
[13] 黄静,李凯.行政区划调整是否强化了土地运营?——来自长三角的政策效果检验[J].热带地理,2021(3):554-561
[14] 李莹,柳建文.总体国家安全观视角下内蒙古边境地区城镇体系优化发展策略[J].内蒙古社会科学,2023(1)
[15] 段成荣,盛丹阳,刘涛.人口流动对边境地区人口安全的影响及机制分析[J].人文地理,2022(4)
[16] 韦绍音,陆汝成,林晓楠,等.广西陆地边境带国土空间格局演化及机理研究[J].中国土地科学,2021(12):98-108
[17] 丁月龙,李晓玲,刘鉴,等.中国东北边境城市城镇化可持续发展过程及机制研究——以东宁和珲春市为例[J].地理科学,2024(3):474-482
[18] 蔡雪雄,郑翀.福建省三大生态区域城镇化协调发展研究[J].福建论坛(人文社会科学版),2018(12):171-180
[19] 李雪梅,刘贺贺.新疆陆路口岸与载体城镇耦合协调发展的时空分异特征[J].干旱区地理,2023(1):149-158
[20] 吕添贵,吴次芳,李洪义等.人口城镇化与土地城镇化协调性测度及优化——以南昌市为例[J].地理科学,2016,36(2):239-246
[21] 牛雅萱,吴世新,郭晨宇等.新疆县市“三生”功能时空变化及耦合协调性分析[J].干旱区地理,2021(6):1821-1835
[22] 倪维秋.中国三大城市群城市土地利用经济、社会、生态效益的耦合协调性及其空间格局[J].城市发展研究,2016(12):69-77
[23] 倪维秋,夏源,赵宁宁.乡村地域“三生空间”功能演化与耦合协调度研究——以黑龙江省为例[J].中国土地科学,2022(9):111-119
[24] 周亮,车磊,孙东琪.中国城镇化与经济增长的耦合协调发展及影响因素[J].经济地理,2019(6):97-107
[25] 苏旭峰,冉启英.西北地区城镇化系统耦合协调发展分析——基于高质量发展视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2021(10):98-103
[26] 张明,杨洪波. 新疆边境口岸经济协调发展研究[J]. 科技与企业, 2020(6):61-64
Outlines

/

〈 〉