Based on the data of survey on residents livelihood security needs in 2022, this paper empirically analyzes the impact and mechanism of community smart services such as network information services and artificial intelligence services on subjective well-being.It is found that community smart services can not only significantly improve the convenience of residents’ life, but also directly improve residents’ subjective well-being, and indirectly improve residents’ subjective well-being through the intermediary of life convenience, highlighting the key of its impact.However, the network information service indirectly promotes residents’ subjective well-being mainly through the intermediary of life convenience, and its indirect effect is dominant. The direct effect of artificial intelligence services on residents’ subjective well-being plays a leading role in the total effect, highlighting the type differences of the impact of community smart services. In addition, the impact of network information services and artificial intelligence services on residents’ subjective well-being, along with the aging of age structure, presents the “inverted J” characteristics of first rising and then significantly decreasing, and the development trend of gradually decreasing, highlighting the age difference of the impact of community intelligent services. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate measures to improve residents’ subjective well-being according to the type and age difference of community smart services.
LIANG Tu-kun
. Mechanisms of the impact of community smart service on residents’ well-being:Empirical analysis based on the data of Survey of Resident Livelihood Security Needs in 2022[J]. Urban Problems, 2022
, 327(10)
: 72
-81
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.221008
[1] 民政部中央政法委中央网信办发展改革委工业和信息化部公安部财政部住房城乡建设部农业农村部印发《关于深入推进智慧社区建设的意见》的通知[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2022(22):37-40
[2] Gordon C F, Juang L P, Syed M. Internet use and well-being among college students: Beyond frequency of use[J]. Journal of College Student Development,2007(6):674-688
[3] 王鹏.互联网使用对幸福感的影响——基于城镇微观数据的实证研究[J].软科学,2014(10):139-144
[4] 鲁元平,王军鹏.数字鸿沟还是信息福利——互联网使用对居民主观福利的影响[J].经济学动态,2020(2):59-73
[5] Li W, Shen S, Yang J, et al. Internet-based medical service use and eudaimonic well-being of urban older adults: A peer support and technology acceptance model[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2021(22):1-8
[6] Paez D, Delfino G, Vargas-Salfate S, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use on subjective well-being[J]. Media Psychology,2020(5):676-710
[7] 龙翠红,易承志,栗长江.互联网使用对居民幸福感的影响:基于全国性数据的实证分析(英文)[J].Social Sciences in China,2019(4):106-128
[8] 周烁,张文韬.互联网使用的主观福利效应分析[J].经济研究,2021(9):158-174
[9] Lifshitz R, Nimrod G, Bachner Y G. Internet use and well-being in later life: a functional approach[J]. Aging & mental health,2018(1):85-91
[10] Kraut R, Burke M. Internet use and psychological well-being: Effects of activity and audience[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2015(12): 94-100
[11] Castellacci F, Tveito V. Internet use and well-being: A survey and a theoretical framework[J]. Research Policy,2018(1):308-325
[12] Nie P, Sousa-Poza A, Nimrod G.Internet use and subjective well-being in China[J]. Social Indicators Research,2017(1):489-516
[13] 郭小弦,芦强,王建.互联网使用与青年群体的幸福感——基于社会网络的中介效应分析[J].中国青年研究,2020(6):5-12
[14] Kumar R. Biases in Artificial intelligence applications affecting human life: A review[J]. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering,2021(1):54-55
[15] 林晨,陈小亮,陈伟泽,陈彦斌.人工智能、经济增长与居民消费改善:资本结构优化的视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(2):61-83
[16] Lu C H. The impact of artificial intelligence on economic growth and welfare[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics,2021(1):1-8
[17] 王娟,张劲松.数字鸿沟:人工智能嵌入社会生活对老年人的影响及其治理[J].湖南社会科学,2021(5):123-130
[18] Nazareno L, Schiff D S. The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being[J]. Technology in Society,2021(1):1-12
[19] Musikanski L, Rakova B, Bradbury J, et al.Artificial intelligence and community well-being: A proposal for an emerging area of research[J]. International Journal of Community Well-Being: Published in collaboration with the Global Community Institute,2020(6):39-55
[20] Davis F. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of information technology[J]. MIS Quarterly,1989(3):319-340
[21] Li W, Shen S, Yang J, et al.Internet-based medical service use and eudaimonic well-being of urban older adults: A peer support and technology acceptance model[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2021(22):1-12
