Research on influencing factors and generation paths of government environmental information disclosure performance:Analysis based on the perspective of institutional logics

  • LUO Dan
Expand

Received date: 2024-08-11

  Revised date: 2024-09-30

  Online published: 2024-12-16

Abstract

Environmental information disclosure is an important tool for government environmental governance. Based on the “institutional logics-embedding degree” framework, this study uses the panel data of 104 key environmental protection cities in China from 2013 to 2018 to identify the multiple influencing factors and generation paths of government environmental information disclosure through a mixed research method. The results show that government environmental information disclosure is not dominated by a single institutional logic, but the result of the interaction among bureaucracy, market, social logics and the embedding degree of government. Among them, the conditions of peer competition, enterprise demand and public attention have a more significant promoting effect on government environmental information disclosure. The generation path of high performance of government environmental information disclosure can be divided into “multiple institutional logics-driven” and “institutional logics and independent embedding-coupling”.In the future,efforts can be made to enhance the performance of environmental information disclosure.

Cite this article

LUO Dan . Research on influencing factors and generation paths of government environmental information disclosure performance:Analysis based on the perspective of institutional logics[J]. Urban Problems, 2024 , 351(10) : 59 -70 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.241006

References

[1] 李永盛,张祥建,赵晓雷.中国环境信息公开的时空演化特征及其影响因素[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020(3):106-114
[2] Li W & Li D. Environmental information transparency and implications for growth in China[J]. Public Administration and Development, 2012(32):324-334
[3] 公众环境研究中心网站. 环境信息公开艰难破冰——(PITI)2008年度报告[EB/OL] (2010-09-17). https://www.ipe.org.cn/reports/report_1725.html
[4] 公众环境研究中心网站.十年有成——《2018-2019年度120城市污染源监管信息公开指数(PITI)报告》[EB/OL] (2020-01-03). https://www.ipe.org.cn/reports/report_2026-0.html
[5] 孙岩,刘红艳,李鹏.中国环境信息公开的政策变迁:路径与逻辑解释[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(2):168-176
[6] 黄艳茹,孟凡蓉,陈子韬,等.政府环境信息公开的影响因素——基于中国城市PITI指数的实证研究[J].情报杂志,2017(7):149-155,58
[7] Johnson T. Environmental information disclosure in China: Policy developments and NGO responses[J]. Policy & Politics, 2011(3):399-416
[8] 孙岩,刘红艳,李鹏. 中国环境信息公开的政策变迁:路径与逻辑解释[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018(2): 168-176
[9] Bu C, Zhang K, Shi D, et al. Does environmental information disclosure improve energy efficiency?[J].Energy Policy, 2022(164):112919
[10] 万晶,李昭华.环境信息披露与出口技术复杂度——基于中国城市数据的影响机制分析[J].城市问题,2022(4):55-64
[11] 郭红彩.政企关系、市场化进程与地方政府环境信息公开——基于我国A股高污染行业的经验证据[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):55-62
[12] 李珒.政策信号的多层级传递与市级政府行为合规:基于环境信息公开案例的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2024(5):188-196
[13] Pien C. P. Local environmental information disclosure and environmental non-governmental organizations in Chinese prefecture-level cities[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2020(275):111225
[14] 王惠娜,郭慧.环境信息公开的生成逻辑及组态模式——120个城市数据的模糊集定性比较[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(5):92-101
[15] 王善勇,张容玮,陈久松.政府环境信息公开及影响因素——基于推拉锚定模型的研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2024(1):89-100
[16] Friedland R & Alford R R. Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991:232–263
[17] Thornton P H & Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990[J].American Journal of Sociology, 1999(3):801-843
[18] Thornton P H & Ocasio W. Institutional Logics. In Greenwood, R. (Ed.),The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism[M]. SAGE, 2008
[19] Thornton, P. H., et al. The Institutional Logics Perspective: Anew Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process[M]. Oxford University Press, 2012
[20] 杜运周,尤树洋.制度逻辑与制度多元性研究前沿探析与未来研究展望[J].外国经济与管理,2013(12):2-10,30
[21] 张三保,田文杰.地方政府企业化:模式、动因、效应与改革[J].政治学研究,2014(6):97-109
[22] 王勇.从“指标下压”到“利益协调”:大气治污的公共环境管理检讨与模式转换[J].政治学研究,2014(2):104-115
[23] 周黎安.晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作——兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J].经济研究,2004(6):33-40
[24] 陈家喜.地方官员政绩激励的制度分析[J].政治学研究,2018(3):72-80,128
[25] 袁方成,姜煜威.“晋升锦标赛”依然有效?——以生态环境治理为讨论场域[J].公共管理与政策评论,2020(3):62-73
[26] 李胜.合法性追求、谋利性倾向与地方政府环境治理的策略性运作[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020(12):137-146
[27] 易兰丽,范梓腾.层级治理体系下的政策注意力识别偏好与政策采纳——以省级“互联网+政务服务”平台建设为例[J].公共管理学报,2022(1):40-51,167
[28] Bu M, Wagner M. Racing to the bottom and racing to the top: The crucial role of firm characteristics in foreign direct investment choices[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2016(47):1032-1057
[29] Meier K J, Favero N, Zhu L. Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A Bayesian Decision Theory of managerial action[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2015(25):1221-1246
[30] Xu C. The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development[J].Journal of Economic Literature,2011(49):1076-1151
[31] 陈钊,徐彤.走向“为和谐而竞争”:晋升锦标赛下的中央和地方治理模式变迁[J].世界经济,2011(9):3-18
[32] 李瑞昌.中国公共政策实施中的“政策空传”现象研究[J].公共行政评论,2012(3):59-85,180
[33] 贺东航,孔繁斌.公共政策执行的中国经验[J].中国社会科学,2011(5):61-79,220-221
[34] 楼苏萍,白雪婷.社会政策层级实施中的省级政府:一个类型学分析[J].公共管理评论,2022(1):5-25
[35] 梅赐琪,翟晓祯.“政绩出官”可持续吗?——挑战晋升锦标赛理论的一个新视角[J].公共行政评论,2018(3):7-27,209
[36] 毛庆铎,甘甜.科层式规训:政府排名的设置逻辑与作用机制[J].公共行政评论,2022(2):60-77,196-197
[37] 马亮.城市排行榜:流行、问题与展望[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2013(3):24-35,125
[38] 马亮,于文轩.第三方公共服务绩效评价的评价:一项比较案例研究[J].南京社会科学,2013(5):55-63
[39] Yu J, Zhou L A, Zhu, G. Strategic interaction in political competition: Evidence from spatial effects across Chinese cities[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2016(57):23–37
[40] 何爱平,安梦天.地方政府竞争、环境规制与绿色发展效率[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019(3):21-30
[41] 韩啸,魏程瑞.风险如何影响政策扩散?——以环境信息公开为例[J].公共管理与政策评论,2021(5):95-104
[42] Walter I, Ugelow J L. Environmental policies in developing countries[J].Ambio, 1979(2):102–109
[43] Porter M E, Linde C V. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995(9):97-118
[44] Mani M, Wheeler D. In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995[J].The Journal of Environment & Development, 1998(3):215–247
[45] 聂飞,刘海云.FDI、环境污染与经济增长的相关性研究——基于动态联立方程模型的实证检验[J].国际贸易问题,2015(2):72-83
[46] 张志彬.公众参与、监管信息公开与城市环境治理——基于35个重点城市的面板数据分析[J].财经理论与实践,2021(1):109-116
[47] 吴力波,杨眉敏,孙可哿.公众环境关注度对企业和政府环境治理的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022(2):1-14
[48] 蔡长昆,杨哲盈.嵌入、吸纳和脱耦:地方政府环境政策采纳的多重模式[J].公共行政评论,2022(2):95-114,198
[49] Abbas M, Tashakkori & Charles B. Teddlie. Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social &Behavioral Research[M].Sage Publications, 2010
[50] Johnson R B, Onwuegbuzie A J, Turner L A. Toward a definition of mixed methods research[J].Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007(2):112–133
[51] 张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报,2019(9):1312-1323
[52] 谭海波,范梓腾,杜运周.技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设——一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J].管理世界,2019(9):81-94
[53] 范梓腾,孟庆国,魏娜,等.效率考量、合法性压力与政府中的技术应用——基于中国城市政府网站建设的混合研究[J].公共行政评论,2018(5):28-51,186-187
[54] 史亚东.公众环境关心、中央环保督察与地方环保支出——采用空间双重差分模型的实证分析[J].西部论坛,2022(1):66-82
[55] 张坤鑫.地方政府注意力与环境政策执行力的倒U形关系研究[J].公共管理评论,2021(4):132-161
[56] 杨帆,章志涵.“繁文缛节”如何影响专项治理绩效?——基于基层政府数据的混合研究[J].公共管理评论,2020(4):110-132
[57] 祝树金,李江,张谦,等.环境信息公开、成本冲击与企业产品质量调整[J].中国工业经济,2022(3):76-94
[58] 阎波,李泓波,吴佳顺,等.政府信息公开的影响因素:中国省级政府的实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2013(6):67-77,124-125
[59] 郑思齐,万广华,孙伟增,等.公众诉求与城市环境治理[J].管理世界,2013(6):72-84
[60] Schneider C Q, Wagemann C. Doing justice to logical remainders in QCA: Moving beyond the Standard Analysis[J].Political Research Quarterly, 2013(66): 211-220
Outlines

/

〈 〉