Against the backdrop of rapid digital economic development, government digital governance has become a crucial pathway for innovating public governance and achieving national governance modernization. This study, grounded in the perspective of production relations optimization and adjustment within the Marxist theory of the interaction between productive forces and production relations, constructs a government digital governance index based on data from Chinese government digital procurement contract announcements. Simultaneously, considering the characteristics of new productive forces, a non-radial, non-angle SBM model is employed to develop an urban new productive forces index. Utilizing panel data from Chinese cities spanning 2011–2022, this study examines the impact of government digital governance on the development of urban new productive forces. The results indicate that government digital governance significantly enhances urban new productive forces. Further analysis reveals that improving digital infrastructure and promoting urban innovation policies strengthen the positive effect of government digital governance on new productive forces. Moreover, cities where production relations align more closely with productive forces experience a more pronounced impact of government digital governance on new productive forces. This research provides valuable theoretical and practical insights for advancing digital transformation in government governance, enhancing the effectiveness and modernization of government economic and social governance, and ultimately fostering the development of urban new productive forces.
HAN Feng
,
SUN Pei-zhe
,
LI Chen-hua
. Government digital governance and the development of New Quality Productivity: A study from the perspective of optimizing and adjusting production relations[J]. Urban Problems, 2025
, 361(8)
: 22
-35
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.250804
[1] 习近平经济思想研究中心.新质生产力的内涵特征和发展重点[N].人民日报,2024-03-01(009)
[2] 刘伟.科学认识与切实发展新质生产力[J].经济研究,2024(3):4-11
[3] 韩文龙.新质生产力的政治经济学阐释[J].马克思主义研究,2024(3):100-115
[4] 郭凯明,王钰冰,杭静.数据要素规模效应、产业结构转型与生产率提升[J].中国工业经济,2024(8):5-23
[5] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995
[6] 马克思,恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯文集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009
[7] 章贵桥,陈志斌,徐宗宇.人工智能发展、政府会计功能拓展与数字政府治理体制的完善[J].中国行政管理,2022(1):48-54
[8] 师博.数字经济促进城市经济高质量发展的机制与路径[J].西安财经大学学报,2020(2):10-14
[9] 石大千,丁海,卫平,等.智慧城市建设能否降低环境污染[J].中国工业经济,2018(6):117-135
[10] Aghion P,Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction[J]. Econometrica,1992(2):323-351
[11] 韩晶,陈曦,冯晓虎.数字经济赋能绿色发展的现实挑战与路径选择[J].改革,2022(9):11-23
[12] 马符讯,张照生.新兴产业的政府数字治理研究——以新能源汽车国家监测与管理平台为例[J].管理评论,2021(11):94-105
[13] 徐艳晴,郭娜,毛子骏,等.政策引导基层政务服务数字化变革研究——以海口市龙华区政务服务中心为例[J].公共管理学报,2022(4):150-165,176
[14] 何雨可,牛耕,逯建,等.数字治理与城市创业活力——来自“信息惠民国家试点”政策的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024(1):47-66
[15] 高帆.系统集成:发展新质生产力的基本方法论[J].改革,2024(7):21-32
[16] 邹娜,付文凯.教育、科技、人才一体化视域下发展新质生产力的四重逻辑和实践路径[J].长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版),2025(1):89-101
[17] Coe D T,Helpman E,Hoffmaister A W. North-south R&D spillovers[J]. Economic Journal,1997(440):134-149
[18] 王永钦,董雯.机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场?——来自制造业上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2020(10):159-175
[19] 许宪春,张美慧.中国数字经济规模测算研究——基于国际比较的视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(5): 23-41
[20] 孙亚男,刘燕伟,傅念豪,等.中国新质生产力的增长模式、区域差异与协调发展[J].财经研究,2024(6):4-18,33
[21] Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001(3):498-509
[22] Donghyun O,Almas A. Sequential Malmquist-luenberger Productivity Index: Environmentally Sensitive Productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology[J]. Energy Economics,2010(9):1345-1355
[23] 李剑培,时洁,顾乃华.数字政府建设对企业数字化转型的溢出效应研究——来自政府采购合同大数据的证据[J].南方经济,2025(2):1-25
[24] 申志轩,祝树金,文茜,等.政府数字采购与企业数字化转型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024(05):71-91
[25] 李雪琴,郑酌基,韩先锋.乘“数”而上:政府数据治理赋能企业数字创新[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024(12):68-88
[26] 谭伟杰,申明浩,李雨洁.政府数字采购政策对企业商业信用融资能力的影响:机制解析与异质效应探讨[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2024(8):56-75
[27] 刘毛桃,方徐兵,李光勤.政府数字关注与企业数字创新——来自政府工作报告文本分析的证据[J].中国经济学,2023(3):111-142,350-352
[28] Shi B, You A. Digital government and international trade[J]. Finance Trade Econ,2021(7):145-160
[29] Hsieh T, Klenow J. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2009(4):1403-1448
