Grounded in the structure-technology analysis framework derived from complex adaptive systems theory, this study examines the internal mechanisms through which digital technology enables agile governance, using "141" grassroots intelligent governance system in Chongqing as a case study. The findings reveal that the "141" system achieves hierarchical differentiation of digital application scenarios through the establishment of three-tier digital urban governance centers. By decentralizing law enforcement resources, it fosters endogenous development of digital technologies. Through governance modularization, it facilitates institutional digital integration, while an integrated digital infrastructure enhances cross-domain and cross-departmental collaboration. The study concludes that the optimal configuration lies in the co-evolution and integration of digital technology and organizational structure, oriented toward enhancing grassroots self-adaptability. The core mechanism underlying this agility is termed "structure-led interactive empowerment", that is, the downward reorganization of structured elements such as hierarchical relationships, power, and resources can transform external digital technologies into internal structured elements, and promote organizational adaptive adjustment through their integrated combination. "Structure-led interactive empowerment" not only clarifies the fundamental and purposeful nature of the downward reorganization of structure in theory, but also provides inspiration for the deepening of agile governance in megacity: the integrated advancement of organizational structure adjustment and digital technology application should take structural adjustment as the starting point and the end point.
LIU Yuan-he
,
WANG Shan
. Structure-Driven Interaction: The mechanism of digital empowerment to agile government in megacities[J]. Urban Problems, 2025
, 361(8)
: 48
-58
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.250806
[1] 中央城市工作会议在北京举行[N].人民日报,2025-07-16(001)
[2] 赵孟营.超大城市治理:国家治理的新时代转向[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2018(4):63-68
[3] 姜晓萍,李敏.治理韧性:新时代中国社会治理的维度与效度[J].行政论坛,2022(3):5-12
[4] Ines Mergel, Sukumar Ganapati, Andrew B. Whitford. Agile: A new way of governing[J].Public Administration Review, 2021(1):161-165
[5] Kil Pyo Hong, Pan Suk Kim. Building an agile government: Its possibilities, challenges, and new tasks[J]. Halduskultuur: The Estonian Journal of Administrative Culture and Digital Governance,2020(1):4-21
[6] 吕童.数字化社会治理平台的协同结构与运行逻辑——以X市社会治理综合指挥平台为例[J].城市问题,2025(2):25-32
[7] 顾丽梅,宋晔琴.超大城市敏捷治理的路径及其优化研究——基于上海市“一网统管”回应社情民意实践的分析[J].中国行政管理,2023(6):6-14
[8] Rio Yusri Maulana, Mitja Deman. Collaborative governance in the digital transformation age: A systematic literature review with bibliometric mapping[J]. Central European Public Administration Review,2023(1):31-60
[9] 邱泽奇.技术与组织的互构——以信息技术在制造企业的应用为例[J].社会学研究,2005(2):32-54,243
[10] 宋晔琴,顾丽梅,张扬.数字平台何以赋能超大城市敏捷治理——基于组织边界跨越视角的分析[J].上海行政学院学报,2024(1):19-31
[11] 邱倩,张继颖,初程程.超大城市治理数字化转型:逻辑、进路与优化[J].北京行政学院学报,2023(6):38-47
[12] 刘元贺,周振超.数字联结与关系下沉:超大城市基层执法共同体的运行逻辑——重庆市D街道行政综合执法运行的观察[J].上海行政学院学报,2025(5):65-75
[13] 董石桃,范赛果.技术执行的结构整合:数字化监督体系运行的逻辑分析[J].学习与实践,2024(4):22-33
[14] 李祖佩.功能悬浮:数字治理的基层境遇及其分析[J].甘肃社会科学,2024(4):102-109
[15] 陈锋,王泽林.技术重塑治理关系与数字治理“内卷化”——以“12345”热线驱动市域治理为例[J].探索,2024(1):115-128
[16] 田媛元,余逊达.数字科层与纵向非均衡赋能问题及其应对——基于浙江农村监督实践的反思[J].浙江社会科学,2025(3):33-45,156
[17] 卢燕璇,张文杰,杨依云,等.技术、权力与控制:“技术—组织”互构视角下的数字化转型与工作关系变迁[J].电子政务,2024(9):51-64
[18] 高恩新,刘璐.平台的“祛魅”:城市治理数字化转型中的组织—技术互嵌逻辑[J].东南学术,2023(2):125-134
[19] 简·E·芳汀著,邵国松译.构建虚拟政府信息技术与制度创新[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:21
[20] 陈那波,张程,李昊霖.把层级带回技术治理——基于“精密智控”实践的数字治理与行政层级差异研究[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2021(5):45-53,158
[21] 娄文龙,王晓萌,王晓慧.数字技术“赋能”何以产生基层治理“负能”?——基于“技术—制度—组织”的分析框架[J].上海行政学院学报,2025(1):69-82
[22] 于文轩,刘丽红.北京“接诉即办”的理论基础和发展方向:敏捷治理的视角[J].中国行政管理,2023(4):38-45
[23] 韩兆坤,何俊华,李辉.数字平台何以助推“高效办成一件事”——基于政务服务“一网通办”的探索性案例研究[J].中国行政管理,2025(6):6-21
[24] 黄甄铭,李昊霖,梁正.基于数字技术的政府组织变革动力机制解释模型——以S区“数字+基层公权力监督”为例[J].管理学报,2025(7):1204-1214,1226
[25] 汪波,蒋君卓.数字政府变革的理论形态变迁与实践模式演进——基于“技术—制度—组织”框架的分析[J].城市问题,2024(3):21-33
[26] 吴晓林.技术赋能与科层规制——技术治理中的政治逻辑[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(2):73-81
[27] 吴晓林,左翔羽.突破科层约束:特大城市数字化风险防控的组织变革[J].管理世界,2025(8):128-142,164,143
[28] 约翰·H·霍兰著,周晓牧,韩晖译.隐秩序:适应性造就复杂性[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000:34
[29] 约翰·H·霍兰著,周晓牧,韩晖译.隐秩序:适应性造就复杂性[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000:71
[30] 刘洪.组织结构变革的复杂适应系统观[J].南开管理评论,2004(3):51-56
[31] Soe R M,Drechsler W. Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2017(2):323-335
[32] 赫广义.中国纵向间政府“职责同构”模式解析[J].河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2):39-43
[33] 朱光磊,杨智雄.职责序构:中国政府职责体系的一种演进形态[J].学术界,2020(5):14-23
[34] 杨华.县乡中国:县域治理现代化[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2022:22
[35] 重庆市人民政府关于数字重庆建设推进情况的报告[EB/OL].重庆人大,https://www.cqrd.gov.cn/web/article/1362087581473521664/web/content_1362087581473521664.html,2025-04-16
[36] 约翰·H·霍兰著,周晓牧,韩晖译.隐秩序:适应性造就复杂性[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000:54
[37] 刘元贺.界面整合与流程可视:数字技术赋能基层减负的实践探索与内在机理——基于重庆市G镇“141”基层智治体系的观察[J].探索,2025(2):115-128
[38] 张燕,邱泽奇.技术与组织关系的三个视角[J].社会学研究,2009(2):200-215,246
[39] 以数字化引领开创现代化新重庆建设新局面[N].重庆日报,2023-04-27(004)
[40] 朱光磊,陈璐.双线改革联动:数字技术与政府组织何以适配——以广东省Y区数字政府建设为例[J].求实,2024(3):19-30,109
