The governance of community violation construction is related to the quality and level of the modernization of grass-roots governance system and governance capacity. Based on an analytical framework based on multiple institutional logic， this paper analyzes the generation logic of construction violation phenomena and its governance dilemmas in H Community， Y City， Sichuan Province. The study found that in community construction violation governance， the government follows the administrative-bureaucratic logic， developers follow the market-capital logic， construction violation owners follow the individual-rational logic， rights advocates follow the community-contract logic， property companies follow the intermediary-operating logic， and the five logics are mutually constrained and there are tensions. The occurrence of community construction violation phenomena is the result of the interaction of market-capital logic， administrative-bureaucratic logic， and individual-rational logic， reflecting the deep contradiction between the expansion of individual interests and the maintenance of public order in the context of rapid urbanization. The deep roots of community violation governance dilemmas lie in the structural incompatibility of multiple institutional logic within the same governance field： differentiated interest claims among various entities lead to violation governance facing a stalemate. Based on this， the key to community violation governance lies in promoting collaborative governance， defining rule boundaries through the construction of authoritative-presented negotiation platforms， optimizing interest-compliant enforcement systems to resolve logical conflicts， and perfecting the supervisory closed loop of the fusion of jurisprudence and common sense.