The impact effect and mechanism of market access on key core technological innovation: Empirical evidences from prefecture-level cities in China
Winning the battle against key core technologies is a crucial measure to enable China to seize the commanding heights of technological development under the current “technology blockade” external environment. This paper constructs a market access index using geographical distance and GDP data, and examines its impact on key core technological innovation based on panel data of 280 prefecture-level cities. The results show that market access promoting key core technological innovation. After a series of robustness tests and endogeneity tests, the above conclusion remains valid. Mechanism tests show that market access enhances regional key core technological innovation levels by deepening specialized division of labor and improving resource allocation efficiency. The innovation incentive effect of market access is more significant in northern cities, regions with a lower level of intellectual property protection, and regions with a lower level of digital infrastructure construction. In addition, optimizing product export channels and leveraging the enabling role of fiscal education and science expenditures can help further exert the positive impact of market access on key core technological innovation environmental pollution is not conducive to creating a favorable innovation ecosystem and hinders the incentive effect of market access on key core technological innovation. This paper not only provides a theoretical explanation for strengthening key core technological innovation through market access, but also offers a theoretical basis and practical support for relying on the construction of a unified national market and fully releasing the advantages of an extremely large market scale to enhance innovation efficiency.
WANG Jia-ting , LI Wen-xuan . The impact effect and mechanism of market access on key core technological innovation: Empirical evidences from prefecture-level cities in China[J]. Urban Problems, 2026 , 368(3) : 4 -17 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.260301
| [1] | 吴群锋,刘冲,刘青.国内市场一体化与企业出口行为——基于市场可达性视角的研究[J].经济学(季刊),2021(5):1639-1660 |
| [2] | 张梦婷,鲍子文,文雁兵,等.区域内交通可达性如何优化企业劳动力资源配置——来自中国1914个区县对的经验证据[J].经济评论,2025(5):119-134 |
| [3] | 蒋伟杰,单亦轲.市场可达性对企业异地合作创新的影响[J].科研管理,2025(2):139-148 |
| [4] | YoungA. The razor's edge: Distortions and incremental reform in the People's Republic of China[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000(4): 1091-1135 |
| [5] | XuX. Have the Chinese provinces become integrated under reform?[J]. China Economic Review, 2002(2-3): 116-133 |
| [6] | PoncetS. Measuring Chinese domestic and international integration[J]. China Economic Review, 2003(1): 1-21 |
| [7] | 盛斌,毛其淋.贸易开放、国内市场一体化与中国省际经济增长:1985—2008年[J].世界经济,2011(11):44-66 |
| [8] | 吕越,盛斌,吕云龙.中国的市场分割会导致企业出口国内附加值率下降吗[J].中国工业经济,2018(5):5-23 |
| [9] | 余泳泽,胡山,杨飞.国内大循环的障碍:区域市场分割的效率损失[J].中国工业经济,2022(12):108-126 |
| [10] | 习明明,张卢千漪,夏若萱.企业数字化转型与关键核心技术突破——基于开放式创新视角[J].商业研究,2025(5):98-108 |
| [11] | 吴超鹏,严泽浩.政府基金引导与企业核心技术突破:机制与效应[J].经济研究,2023(6):137-154 |
| [12] | 徐霞,赵明明,吴福象.企业技术网络结构与关键核心技术创新速度——基于组合创新逻辑[J].中国工业经济,2024(9):100-117 |
| [13] | 杨震宁,袁梓晋.数字创新网络嵌入与关键核心技术攻关[J].中国工业经济,2025(5):156-173 |
| [14] | CenamorJ, ParidaV, WincentJ. How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 100: 196-206 |
| [15] | DongX, ZhengS, KahnM E. The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2020, 115: 103212 |
| [16] | 罗小芳,卢现祥.交易成本、普遍制度与全国统一大市场[J].经济学动态,2023(6):15-28 |
| [17] | 刘冲,吴群锋,刘青.交通基础设施、市场可达性与企业生产率——基于竞争和资源配置的视角[J].经济研究,2020(7):140-158 |
| [18] | 胡增玺,马述忠.市场一体化对企业数字创新的影响——兼论数字创新衡量方法[J].经济研究,2023(6):155-172 |
| [19] | 王桂军,张辉.促进企业创新的产业政策选择:政策工具组合视角[J].经济学动态,2020(10):12-27 |
| [20] | 刘友金,尹延钊,曾小明.中国向“一带一路”国家产业转移的互惠共生效应——基于双边价值链升级视角的研究[J].经济地理,2020(10):136-146 |
| [21] | StiglerG J. The division of labor is limited by the extent of the market[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1951(3): 185-193 |
| [22] | Van OortF. Innovation and agglomeration economies in the Netherlands[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 2002(3): 344-360 |
| [23] | 李磊,刘斌,郑昭阳,等.地区专业化能否提高我国的出口贸易技术复杂度?[J].世界经济研究,2012(6):30-37,88 |
| [24] | EllisonG, GlaeserE L. Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997(5): 889-927 |
| [25] | 王文,牛泽东.资源错配对中国工业全要素生产率的多维影响研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2019(3):20-37 |
| [26] | 范子英,周小昶.财政激励、市场一体化与企业跨地区投资——基于所得税分享改革的研究[J].中国工业经济,2022(2):118-136 |
| [27] | 元茹静,钞小静.数字基础设施建设对关键核心技术突破的影响——来自专利文本机器学习的经验证据[J].经济与管理研究,2024(11):14-31 |
| [28] | 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023(10):1-13 |
| [29] | 宫映华,钟世虎,张尚蓉.助力我国战略性新兴产业发展的税收政策局限与完善[J].税务研究,2023(11):23-28 |
| [30] | 黄先海,王瀚迪,孙涌铭,等.数字技术与企业出口质量升级——来自专利文本机器学习的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023(12):69-89 |
| [31] | PerraE, SanfilippoM, SundaramA. Roads, competition, and the informal sector[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2024, 171: 103339 |
| [32] | ZhengS, KahnM E. China’s bullet trains facilitate market integration and mitigate the cost of megacity growth[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013(14): E1248-E1253 |
| [33] | TombeT, ZhuX. Trade, migration, and productivity: A quantitative analysis of China[J]. American Economic Review, 2019(5): 1843-1872 |
| [34] | DonaldsonD, HornbeckR. Railroads and American economic growth: A “market access” approach[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2016(2): 799-858 |
| [35] | BernardA B, EatonJ, JensenJ B, et al. Plants and productivity in international trade[J]. American Economic Review, 2003(4): 1268-1290 |
| [36] | SunY, GrimesS. The actors and relations in evolving networks: The determinants of inter-regional technology transaction in China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 125: 125-136 |
| [37] | 王彩艳,刘修岩.交通基础设施建设、国内市场一体化与乡村振兴——基于市场准入视角的研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2024(5):16-27 |
| [38] | LiuZ, HeC, ZhangQ, et al. Extracting the dynamics of urban expansion in China using DMSP-OLS nighttime light data from 1992 to 2008[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012(1): 62-72 |
| [39] | 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120 |
| [40] | 李茂林,王子路,何光辉,等.银行业金融科技创新、结构性普惠效应与创业活力[J].管理世界,2024(6):195-224 |
| [41] | 白俊红,张艺璇,卞元超.创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2022(6):61-78 |
| [42] | 白俊红,刘宇英.对外直接投资能否改善中国的资源错配[J].中国工业经济,2018(1):60-78 |
| [43] | 李政,杨思莹.创新型城市试点提升城市创新水平了吗?[J].经济学动态,2019(8):70-85 |
| [44] | 钞小静,廉园梅,罗鎏锴.新型数字基础设施对制造业高质量发展的影响[J].财贸研究,2021(10):1-13 |
| [45] | 周代数.中国财政支出结构对全要素生产率影响的实证分析[J].技术经济与管理研究,2018(8):101-106 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |