Overcoming participation barriers in the intelligent transformation of grassroots governance: A practical analysis based on the“ Root Database” governance model in ordos
The intelligent transformation of grassroots governance is a key path to enhance governance efficiency and promote the modernization of national governance. However, the imbalance of technological empowerment has created new barriers to participation, which hinders the achievement of diverse governance and precise service goals. By reviewing relevant literature and analyzing the governance model of the "root database" in Ordos, a collaborative framework for resolving participation barriers between "demand-driven" and "technology-embedded" is constructed.The practical mechanism of demand-driven governance follows the progressive logic of demand consensus, demand symbiosis, and demand co-increase; the technology-embedded path relies on the coordinated efforts of three empowerment mechanisms: agile response, flexible governance, and buffering mechanisms.Demand-driven provides value guidance and resource foundation for technology embedding, while technology embedding provides practical paths for demand satisfaction through localization adaptation. At the same time, there is a risk of decreased response efficiency in demand-driven development, and there is a risk of imbalanced adaptability in technology embedding. Measures such as strengthening cross-departmental collaboration, enhancing grassroots demand conversion capabilities, optimizing participation channels, and promoting technology to take root in practice need to be taken to address this issue.
WANG Shi-qiang , FU Ji-shan , LI Dong-li . Overcoming participation barriers in the intelligent transformation of grassroots governance: A practical analysis based on the“ Root Database” governance model in ordos[J]. Urban Problems, 2026 , 368(3) : 33 -44 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.260303
| [1] | 顾丽梅,张浩泽.数字赋能的“人情阻滞”:基层治理中的技术悖论与目标异化——基于F市Y区的质性研究[J].电子政务,2026(3):43-55 |
| [2] | LeeJ,HamJ,ChoiB.Effect of government data openness on a knowledge-based economy[J].Procedia Computer Science,2016(91):158-167 |
| [3] | 章敏敏.基层治理数字化转型:应然逻辑、制约症结与纾解路径[J].学术界,2025(6):66-75 |
| [4] | 赵淼,鲍静,刘银喜.从赋能到包容:数字政府建设非均衡困境生成机制及化解路径[J].中国行政管理,2022(12):41-48 |
| [5] | 刘威,王碧晨.赋能何以成负能?——城乡数字治理非意向后果的形成机理[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2025(4):259-271,288 |
| [6] | RagneddaM.The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities[M].New York: Routledge, 2017:15 |
| [7] | 沈费伟,胡紫依.主体自觉培育:推动数字弱势群体参与数字乡村建设的策略选择[J].江苏社会科学,2024(5):134-143 |
| [8] | 赵淼,刘银喜.公共价值共创何以弥合老年数字鸿沟?——基于上海市“数字伙伴计划”的案例研究[J].电子政务,2026(3):16-28 |
| [9] | 刘超,夏湘玉.基层数字治理平台的效能悖论:现实表征、生成机理与纾解策略[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2025(4):53-63 |
| [10] | 陈荣卓,万新波.数字技术赋能基层治理的运行机理及改革进路[J].改革,2024(12):138-148 |
| [11] | DunleavyP,MargettsH,BastowS,et al.New public management is dead-long live Digital-Era governance[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2006(3):467-494 |
| [12] | 袁千里,张云翔.基于信息技术的共同生产:作用、影响因素和挑战[J].公共行政评论,2022(1):171-195 |
| [13] | RaiA.Explainable AI:From black box to glass box[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2019(10):1-5 |
| [14] | 刘晋.新质生产力赋能共同富裕:理论逻辑、关键问题与路径选择[J].临沂大学学报,2025(5):100-111 |
| [15] | 尼古拉斯·卡尔著,姜忠伟译.数字乌托邦:一部数字时代的尖锐反思史[M].北京:中信出版社,2018:340-341 |
| [16] | 彭勃.技术治理的限度及其转型:治理现代化的视角[J].社会科学,2020(5):3-12 |
| [17] | 耿亚东,任亚菲.技术赋能城市基层治理数字化转型的三重悖论与突破路径——以Z市Y区智慧城管为例[J].领导科学,2025(4):105-112 |
| [18] | 周维栋,周佑勇.数字政府如何与法治政府更好结合?——基于技术与制度融合的分析视角[J].中国行政管理,2023(10):71-80 |
| [19] | 晏晓娟.城乡融合发展的数智治理逻辑与路径优化[J].江苏社会科学,2025(4):142-149 |
| [20] | 吴新星.数字技术赋能城市基层治理的行动障碍与突破策略——基于S市G区F街道数字治理创新实践的参与式观察[J].河南社会科学,2022(6):82-91 |
| [21] | 谈小燕.以社区为本的参与式治理:制度主义视角下的城市基层治理创新[J].新视野,2020(3):80-87 |
| [22] | 万玲.社会组织参与基层治理的动因、困境与实践路径——基于对J社区的观察与分析[J].领导科学,2022(6):107-111 |
| [23] | 吕鹏,付森.权利慰藉:政策制定中的知识分工与公众参与[J].浙江社会科学,2021(12):58-67,157 |
| [24] | 蔡晓婷,汪华.乡村数字治理的技术悖论与形成逻辑——基于数据-平台-空间的分析框架[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2025(3):94-106 |
| [25] | 李浩,刘璇.从“超负荷”到“超复合”:党建引领基层复合治理体系的结构困境与韧性构建[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2025(4):23-32 |
| [26] | 朱金涛,孙迎联.数字乡村治理“虚化”问题的深层肇因与化解机制——基于“技术-主体-信任”的分析框架[J].新疆社会科学,2025(3):152-160 |
| [27] | 董树彬,崔楠.乡村数字治理何以有效:基于“数字嵌入—结构调适”的分析框架[J].浙江学刊,2025(4):222-229,2 |
| [28] | 赵津平.技术嵌入、组织调适与制度变革:基层政府数字化转型路径研究——以“巨好办”综合管理平台为例[J].领导科学,2025(3):143-151 |
| [29] | 詹国辉.基层数字治理“局部空转”困境及其多维治理[J].江苏社会科学,2025(3):100-109 |
| [30] | 张志原,燕继荣.中国城市基层治理的模式演进与内在逻辑——基于“需求-回应”框架的分析[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2025(3):26-37 |
| [31] | 王俊豪,朱晓玲,陈海彬.民营企业参与PPP的非正式制度壁垒分析——基于新制度经济学的视角[J].财经论丛,2017(6):107-113 |
| [32] | 杨秀勇,朱鑫磊,曹现强.数字治理驱动居民社区参与:作用效果及限度——基于“全国社区治理和服务创新实验区”的实证研究[J].电子政务,2023(2):72-82 |
| [33] | 王玉龙,栗兴芸,李齐.适配性变革:技术治理的理论逻辑与实践进路[J].中国行政管理,2024(1):121-130 |
| [34] | 郭烁,张光.基于协同理论的市域社会治理协作模型[J].社会科学家,2021(4):133-138 |
| [35] | 杨巧云,梁诗露,杨丹.数字包容:发达国家的实践探索与经验借鉴[J].情报理论与实践,2022(3);194-201 |
| [36] | 肖希明,曾粤亮.新公共服务理论与公共数字文化服务资源整合[J].图书馆建设,2015(8):38-43 |
| [37] | 董建坤,王红妹,邢以群,等.价值共创与技术创新:卫生健康数字化转型中公平问题何以化解——基于医保码适老化案例的分析[J].电子政务,2025(10):87-99 |
| [38] | BrysonJM,CrosbyBC, BloombergL.Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management[J].Public Administration Review,2014(4):445-456 |
| [39] | 曹海军,熊志强.价值共创:社会治理中数字赋能的实现机制[J].治理研究,2024(1):62-74,158-159 |
| [40] | 张帆.信息技术赋能基层治理的路径与限度[J].兰州学刊,2021(10):65-78 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |