The conceptual definition, theoretical genealogy, and practical pathways of international exchange center cities: Taking Beijing as an example

  • LIU Bo
Expand

Received date: 2026-04-03

  Revised date: 2026-05-16

  Online published: 2026-09-20

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the deep integration of globalization and informatization, transnational exchanges among cities have become increasingly frequent, and international exchange functions have gradually emerged as a key dimension for assessing a city’s level of internationalization and global influence. Following theoretical paradigms such as the world city and global city, the “international exchange center city”—as an urban development type characterized by comprehensive exchange capacity—still lacks systematic conceptual definition and theoretical elaboration. Building on a review of research on world cities, global cities, and international cities, this study proposes an analytical framework for “international exchange center cities,” and provides a systematic argument from the perspectives of conceptual connotations, functional mechanisms, and typological features. Taking Beijing as a case, the paper examines the formation mechanisms and practical pathways of its development as an international exchange center. The study finds that an international exchange center city emphasizes a city’s hub position within global exchange networks, with its core lying in the integrated aggregation of multidimensional exchange capacities. Beijing’s development as an international exchange center demonstrates a model combining national strategic guidance, major-event driven dynamics, and support from spatial carriers, offering important experience for understanding how China’s megacities participate in the global exchange system.

Cite this article

LIU Bo . The conceptual definition, theoretical genealogy, and practical pathways of international exchange center cities: Taking Beijing as an example[J]. Urban Problems, 2026 , 370(5) : 47 -54 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.260504

References

[1] Amin A, Thrift N.Cities: Reimagining the Urban[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002
[2] Acuto M. Global Cities, Governance and Diplomacy: The Urban Link[M]. London: Routledge, 2013
[3] 高鹏. 全球城市研究的新理论和新方法——评哈里森和霍伊勒著《全球城市研究》[J], 全球城市研究(中英文), 2022(4): 173-176
[4] 立足优势深化改革勇于开拓在建设首善之区上不断取得新成绩[N]. 人民日报, 2014-02-27(1)
[5] 文余源, 余子龙, 张超. 中国世界级城市群建设:概念、框架与路径[J], 城市问题, 2024(12): 4-18
[6] Friedmann J, Wolff G.World City formation: An agenda for research and action[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1982(3): 309-343
[7] Sassen S.The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991
[8] Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996
[9] Taylor P J.Measurement of the World City Network[J]. Urban Studies, 2001(10): 1815-1827
[10] 吴晓琪. 全球城市综合实力评价体系构建与测评[J]. 经济纵横, 2023(3): 120-128
[11] Curtis S.Global Cities and Global Order[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016
[12] 迈克尔·巴蒂著, 刘朝晖, 吕荟译. 新城市科学[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2019: 78
[13] Borgatti S P.Centrality and network flow[J]. Social Networks, 2005(1): 55-71
[14] 周密, 刘力燔. 国际前沿性城市研究综合述评及发展趋势探析——基于近年SSCI相关文献的可视化分析[J]. 城市问题, 2024(7): 4-21
[15] 陈振羽, 魏钢, 靳子琦, 等. 从设计到治理——新发展阶段的城市设计制度探索和治理体系创新路径初探[J]. 城市规划, 2024(S1): 79-86
[16] 庄贵阳, 周伟驿. 非国家行为主体参与和全球气候治理体系转型——城市与城市网络的角色[J]. 外交评论, 2016(3): 133-156
[17] Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P.Clusters and knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the process of knowledge creation[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2004(1): 31-56
[18] 陈刚, 陈雁云, 王光辉, 等. 多维网络嵌入对城市群城市经济增长的影响——以中国五大城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2025(4): 1158-1174
[19] Taylor P J, Hoyler M, Verbruggen R.External urban relational process: Introducing Central Flow Theory to complement Central Place Theory[J]. Urban Studies, 2010(13): 2803-2818
[20] Pierre J.The Politics of Urban Governance[M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011
[21] 清华大学中国发展规划研究院. 国际交往中心城市指数2025[R].2025年
[22] Allen J.Scott (Ed.). Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001
[23] International Congress and Convention Association. ICCA GlobeWatch: Business Analytics—Country & City Rankings 2025[R]. Amsterdam: International Congress and Convention Association, 2026
[24] 市委常委会召开扩大会议传达学习贯彻习近平总书记对北京城市总体规划重要讲话精神[N]. 北京日报, 2017-07-03(1)
[25] 北京市人民政府. 北京城市总体规划(2016—2035年)[R]. 2017年
[26] 在出席北京大兴国际机场投运仪式并巡览航站楼时的讲话[N]. 人民日报, 2019-09-26(1)
[27] 叶中华. 北京擘画“一核两轴多板块”国际交往新格局[N]. 中国城市报, 2025-10-14(1)
[28] 中国新闻网. 北京提升打造“第二个三里屯”国际交往新场景[EB/OL]. http://www.chinanews.com.cn/cj/2025/10-16/10499689.shtml
[29] 李国平, 何皛彦, 冯雨雪. 京津冀协同发展:分析框架、实践进展和路径优化[J]. 城市发展研究, 2024(12): 19-26
[30] 人民网. 北京建成通达五洲、覆盖全国主要城市的航线网络体系[EB/OL]. http://bj.people.com.cn/n2/2025/1015/c14540-41380579.html
[31] 首都之窗. 北京市形成全方位立体化国际友城交往格局[EB/OL]. https://www.beijing.gov.cn/ywdt/gzdt/202603/t20260321_4563135.html
[32] Katz B, Bradley J.The Metropolitan Revolution: How Cities and Metros Are Fixing Our Broken Politics and Fragile Economy[M]. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2013
Outlines

/

〈 〉