Technological relatedness and regional industrial chain segments: Taking integrated circuit industrial chain in the Yangtze River Delta as an example

  • LI Ying-cheng ,
  • FU Jing-xuan ,
  • SUN Kang ,
  • Colleagues
Expand

Received date: 2026-04-22

  Revised date: 2026-06-12

  Online published: 2026-10-15

Abstract

Taking the integrated circuit (IC) industry in the Yangtze River Delta as a case study, this paper divides the IC industrial chain into five segments: material manufacturing, equipment manufacturing, integrated circuit manufacturing, packaging and testing, and design. Based on firm-level and patent data from 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta during 2010-2024, we establish a matching framework between industrial chain segments, technological categories, and firms to characterize the spatiotemporal patterns and evolutionary dynamics of IC industrial chain differentiation. Furthermore, we measure the technological relatedness between different industrial chain segments and cities' existing technological capabilities, and examine its effects on cities' entry into specific segments. The results show that: First, the differentiation of IC industrial chain segments in the Yangtze River Delta exhibits a “patchy diffusion” and “peripheral penetration” spatial pattern, an upstream-oriented restructuring of segment composition, and a dynamic trajectory of initial expansion followed by contraction. Second, technological relatedness significantly increases the likelihood of cities entering corresponding industrial chain segments, indicating that the alignment between cities' existing technological capabilities and the technological requirements of target segments is a key determinant of regional industrial chain differentiation. Third, city size, measured by population and economic scale, negatively moderates the effect of technological relatedness on industrial segment entry. This study extends the application of the “relatedness principle” in evolutionary economic geography from industrial diversification to industrial chain segment specialization, and provides policy implications for differentiated industrial chain development and regional coordination in the Yangtze River Delta.

Cite this article

LI Ying-cheng , FU Jing-xuan , SUN Kang , Colleagues . Technological relatedness and regional industrial chain segments: Taking integrated circuit industrial chain in the Yangtze River Delta as an example[J]. Urban Problems, 2026 , 371(6) : 56 -67 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.260605

References

[1] 马征远,刘樱霞,王琼,等. 新发展格局下长三角产业链协同发展的挑战及应对[J]. 科技导报,2022(17):15-23
[2] 张杰,孙斌栋. 联系视角下城市群城际功能分工及其经济绩效[J]. 城市问题,2025(6):18-27,86
[3] Frenken K,Boschma R A.A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography:Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2007(5):635-649
[4] 康淑娟. 行业异质性视角下高技术产业创新价值链效率测度——基于SFA修正的三阶段DEA模型的实证分析[J]. 科技管理研究,2017(6):7-12
[5] Hidalgo C A,Klinger B,Barabási A,et al.The product space conditions the development of nations[J]. Science,2007(5837):482-487
[6] Hidalgo C A,Balland P A,Boschma R,et al.The Principle of Relatedness[C]. Cham:Springer,2018:451-457
[7] 马双,曾刚,张翼鸥. 技术关联性、复杂性与区域多样化——来自中国地级市的证据[J]. 地理研究,2020(4):865-879
[8] 王媛玉. 虚拟与地理双重集聚促进城市群空间功能分工协同研究[J]. 经济经纬,2025(3):3-16
[9] 王建华. 中国城市战略性新兴产业技术路径演化机制——路径依赖还是随机偶然?[J]. 科学学研究,2023(10):1765-1775,1896
[10] 覃成林,李超. 要素禀赋结构、技术选择与中国城市现代产业发展[J]. 产业经济研究,2012(3):18-25
[11] 王建华,赵柯,谢清泉. 创新策源与城市战略性新兴产业技术路径发展[J]. 科学学研究,2024(11):2454-2464
[12] Boschma R A,Frenken K.Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science?Towards an evolutionary economic geography[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2006(3):273-302
[13] Martin R,Sunley P.Path dependence and regional economic evolution[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2006(4):395-437
[14] Boschma R,Balland P A,Kogler D F. Relatedness and technological change in cities:The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from1981 to 2010[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2015(1):223-250
[15] Breschi S,Lissoni F.Knowledge Networks from Patent Data:Methodological Issues and Research Targets[M]. Dordrecht:Springer,2004:613-643
[16] Guevara R M,Hartmann D,Aristarán M,et al.The research space:Using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals,institutions,and nations[J]. Scientometrics,2016(3):1695-1709
[17] 李伟,贺灿飞. 中国区域产业演化路径——基于技术关联性与技术复杂性的研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2021(4):620-634
[18] 贺灿飞,朱晟君. 中国产业发展与布局的关联法则[J]. 地理学报,2020(12):2684-2698
[19] 徐洁,李琳. 技术关联、产业政策与中国城市突破性创新[J]. 地理研究,2023(10):2796-2816
[20] Chen H,Chen P,Hu S,et al.The impact of relatedness and unrelatedness on breakthrough innovation in China:Examining the role of complementary interregional linkages[J]. Applied Geography,2025,180:103667
[21] Morales H,Atienza M,Lufin M,et al.Disentangling regional diversification:Identifying theoretical and empirical challenges through complex networks[J]. Growth and Change,2025(2):e70024-e70024
[22] 李伟,贺灿飞. 城市新产业与城市经济增长:演化经济地理学视角[J]. 城市发展研究,2020(6):51-61,173
[23] 盛科荣,王丽萍,孙威. 中国城市价值链功能分工及其影响因素[J]. 地理研究,2020(12):2763-2778
[24] Duranton G,Puga D.Nursery Cities:Urban diversity,process innovation,and the life cycle of products[J]. The American Economic Review,2001(5):1454-1477
[25] 刘志东,高洪玮. 中国制造业集聚的演变特征及其影响因素——基于空间面板模型的实证研究[J]. 经济地理,2021(12):33-42
[26] 吴菲菲,韩朝曦,黄鲁成. 集成电路产业研发合作网络特征分析——基于产业链视角[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020(8):77-85
[27] 孙琴,刘戒骄,胡贝贝. 中国集成电路产业链与创新链融合发展研究[J]. 科学学研究,2023(7):1223-1233,1281
[28] 蔡跃洲,韦结余,钟洲. 全球集成电路产业链:分布、技术经济特征及挑战[J]. 国际经济评论,2024(3):89-107,6
[29] Boschma R.Relatedness as driver of regional diversification:A research agenda[J]. Regional Studies,2016(3):351-364
[30] Boschma R,Frenken K.The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography[J]. Journal of Economic Geography,2011(2):295-307
[31] Neffke F,Henning M,Boschma R.How do regions diversify over time?Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions[J]. Economic Geography,2011(3):237-265
[32] Boschma R,Frenken K.Technological relatedness,related variety and economic geography[A]. //Cooke P,Asheim B,Boschma R,et al. Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar,2011:187-197
[33] Whittle A,Kogler F D.Related to what?Reviewing the literature on technological relatedness:Where we are now and where can we go?[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2020(1):97-113
[34] 袁冬梅,信超辉,袁珶. 产业集聚模式选择与城市人口规模变化——来自285个地级及以上城市的经验证据[J]. 中国人口科学,2019(6):46-58,127
[35] 李伟,伏怡铭,王宛,等. 地区经济复杂度对对称关联性产业分化的影响[J]. 地理学报,2024(8):1994-2019
[36] 丁从明,聂军. 城市规模分布对资源配置效率的影响——基于中国23个省级面板数据的分析[J]. 城市问题,2016(10):4-11
[37] Pinheiro F L,Hartmann D,Boschma R,et al.The time and frequency of unrelated diversification[J]. Research Policy,2022(8):104323
[38] 孙斌栋. 优化我国城市体系推动城市高质量发展[J]. 城市问题,2025(8):4-11
[39] 沈能. 空间集聚、规模门槛与技术创新:基于中国制造业企业普查数据的实证分析[J]. 管理工程学报,2014(4):21-27
[40] 陈鸿基,曾刚,曹贤忠,等. 知识基础、补充性联系与长三角地区突破性创新[J]. 地理研究,2025(12):3374-3391
[41] 陈鹏鑫,曾刚,陈鸿基,等. 关联度—复杂度框架下外部联系对区域科学知识多样化的影响——基于中国地级市的研究[J]. 地理科学进展,2025(12):2543-2558
[42] Balland P,Boschma R,Crespo J,et al.Smart specialization policy in the European Union:Relatedness,knowledge complexity and regional diversification[J]. Regional Studies,2019(9):1252-1268
[43] Li Y,Rigby D.Relatedness,complexity,and economic growth in Chinese cities[J]. International Regional Science Review,2023(1):3-37
[44] 谢玉欢,贺灿飞. 地方集群网络、信息溢出效应与中国ICT产品出口地理网络扩张[J]. 地理研究,2021(3):689-707
[45] 雷瑾亮,张剑,马晓辉. 集成电路产业形态的演变和发展机遇[J]. 中国科技论坛,2013(7):34-39
[46] Sun K,Li Y. How the nature of technologies influences their cross-city inflows:Empirical evidence from China,2001-2020[J]. Regional Studies,2025(1):2572710
Outlines

/

〈 〉