The evolution of endogenous systems in Modern Capital Metropolitan Area: Theoretical framework and practical approaches

  • YE Tang-lin ,
  • LIU Hua-zhen ,
  • YANG Kai-zhong
Expand

Received date: 2026-06-03

  Revised date: 2026-07-18

  Online published: 2026-11-04

Abstract

The Modern Capital Metropolitan Area serves as a core spatial platform for advancing the coordinated development of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in greater depth in the new era. Promoting its development is an important practice for safeguarding the functions of the capital, advancing coordinated regional development, and improving the system of cross-jurisdictional spatial governance. From the perspective of endogenous metropolitan evolution, this study constructs an analytical framework, and systematically examines the formation basis, evolutionary dynamics, practical constraints, and optimization pathways of the Modern Capital Metropolitan Area. The findings show that the endogenous evolution of the Modern Capital Metropolitan Area follows the “green-smart-resilient symbiosis law” and is jointly driven by six endogenous variables: the endowments of production, living, and ecological elements; flow distance; the law of scale; technological innovation; dynamic preferences; and institutional innovation. A comparative analysis with the Shanghai Metropolitan Area, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, and the Tokyo Metropolitan Area reveals that the Modern Capital Metropolitan Area still faces a number of constraints, including insufficient coordination among production, living, and ecological endowments, relatively strong flow-distance constraints, an underdeveloped polycentric spatial structure, weak coordination along innovation chains, inadequate guidance of dynamic preferences, and lagging provision of institutional innovation. Future development should therefore improve the endogenous evolutionary mechanism by promoting complementarity among production, living, and ecological endowments, advancing spatial integration, fostering clustered agglomeration structured around “one core, two central cities, three strategic poles, and multiple nodes,” strengthening the integration of “quality-talent-innovation,” guiding dynamic preferences, and promoting institutional innovation, thereby facilitating the formation of a high-quality and coordinated development pattern driven by endogenous evolution in the Modern Capital Metropolitan Area.

Cite this article

YE Tang-lin , LIU Hua-zhen , YANG Kai-zhong . The evolution of endogenous systems in Modern Capital Metropolitan Area: Theoretical framework and practical approaches[J]. Urban Problems, 2026 , 372(7) : 12 -23 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.260702

References

[1] 陆军. 都市圈协同发展的理论逻辑与路径选择[J]. 人民论坛,2020(27):54-57
[2] 赵佩佩,方建裕,丁于钊,等. 基于多源数据的宁波都市圈同城化发展审视及空间协同策略[J]. 城市规划学刊,2023(2):77-87
[3] 李培庆,赵新正,姜永青,等. 中国都市圈功能分工水平的时空特征及其对经济发展效率的影响[J]. 地理科学进展,2024(4):644-656
[4] 陈宏胜,邓书涵,李峥. 基于“核心—边缘”视角的都市圈空间结构——以广州、深圳都市圈为例[J]. 资源科学,2025(2):254-267
[5] 张京祥,胡航军. 新发展环境下的都市圈发展、规划与治理创新[J]. 经济地理,2023(1):17-25
[6] 李国平,吕爽. 京津冀协同发展战略实施成效及其重点方向研究[J]. 城市问题,2024(2):4-10
[7] 赵弘. 以现代化首都都市圈建设引领京津冀协同发展实现新突破[J]. 城市问题,2024(2):11-17
[8] 于涛方,邵军,舒天衡,等. 从中部核心功能区到首都都市圈:京津冀协同发展回顾及展望[J]. 城市发展研究,2024(12):10-18
[9] 杨开忠. 以新质生产力引领工业文明向生态文明跃迁[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2026(1):1-17
[10] 席广亮,甄峰,方创琳,等. 形流融合视角的都市圈国土空间优化与协调发展[J]. 地理学报,2025(2):272-287
[11] 耿慧,焦华富,叶雷. 都市圈一体化共生网络系统的理论框架与研究重点[J]. 地理研究,2023(2):475-494
[12] 张青睿,毛艳华,柯蕴颖,等. 城市群建设如何推动城际联合创新:基于多维邻近性视角的解释[J]. 中国软科学,2024(12):87-97
[13] 杨开忠,刘威,董亚宁,等. 区域经济发展新逻辑:纳入旅行成本的新空间经济学[J]. 世界经济,2024(1):30-56
[14] 林民望,兰婧灵,邢小宇. 城市群政策何以促进城乡融合发展:基于要素流动的视角[J]. 中国软科学,2026(6):211-224
[15] 骆军强,张子宁,张培蕾,等. 中国都市圈人地关系演变中的城镇化与生态环境质量耦合[J]. 资源科学,2025(2):281-293
[16] 柯蕴颖,张青睿,王光辉. 城市群政策推动区域合作创新——在交流中寻求融合、在集聚中走向扩散[J]. 经济学(季刊),2025(2):343-359
[17] 洪歌,蒋自然,张建珍,等. 中国城市多中心结构及其经济绩效研究[J]. 地理研究,2024(11):2827-2846
[18] 杨开忠. 建立绿智时代的城市经济学:新城市经济学[J]. 城市问题,2024(5):4-8
[19] 吴家臣,杜志章. 超大城市灾害韧性的生成机制及其治理转向——基于CAS理论视角的分析[J]. 城市问题,2025(6):87-94
[20] 颜廷标. 构建京津冀协同创新共同体:底层逻辑与优化路径[J]. 河北学刊,2023(6):131-136
[21] 余杰,李鲁奇,吕立刚,等. 基于尺度重构与多层级治理的都市圈治理体系建构——以南京都市圈为例[J]. 资源科学,2025(2):238-253
[22] 石敏俊,孙艺文. 中国都市圈的产业分工与功能协同分析[J]. 地理学报,2024(10):2495-2510
[23] 吴爱芝,李国平. 京津冀协同创新的进展评价与优化策略研究[J]. 城市问题,2024(3):46-54
[24] 文余源,刘洋,余子龙. 流空间研究的演进框架与分析范式[J]. 地理学报,2025(4):886-904
[25] 人民日报. 日本人口加速向东京都市圈集中[N]. 人民日报,2024-02-22(17)
[26] 王德利. 市郊铁路建设与超大城市“1小时通勤圈”空间重构研究——基于环京通勤圈的实证分析[J]. 城市问题,2023(12):70-77
[27] 王媛玉,杨开忠. 集聚经济、城市生产率与最优规模[J]. 统计与决策,2022(2):94-98
Outlines

/

〈 〉