Based on the balanced panel data of 263 prefecture-level cities in China from 2005 to 2020,this paper takes the gradual promotion of the comprehensive financial reform experimental zone and innovative cities as a quasinatural experiment,and builds a two way fixed effect model to empirically study the net effect of dual piloting on urban innovation level,using progressive double difference estimation method.The results show that:First,dual piloting of two policies has significantly improved urban innovation level,and after a series of robustness tests this conclusion is still valid.Second,mechanism research finds the upgrading of industrial structure has played a certain channel effect.Third,further analysis finds that dual piloting of two policies has more effectively promoted the improvement of urban innovation level than single piloting of either policy,and it has a more significant effect on cities in central and western China and cities with low initial innovation foundation.In order to further optimize the policy effect, it is necessary to strengthen the coordination and linkage between innovation related policies, timely carry out the scientific evaluation of policy effect and pilot acceptance, promote the rationalization and upgrading of the industrial structure, and rationally carry out the policy layout in combination with the urban differences.
HUANG Xiao-ting
,
SUN Jiu-wen
,
Ding Jie
. The innovation driven effect of the dual pilot of Comprehensive Financial Reform Experimental Zone and Innovative City[J]. Urban Problems, 2023
, 331(2)
: 49
-60
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230205
[1] Ramzit T, Salah A B. The determinations of innovation capacity in the less innovative countires in The Euro-Mediterranean Region[J].Journal of the Knowledge Economy,2015(9):526-543
[2] 周锐波,刘叶子,杨卓文. 中国城市创新能力的时空演化及溢出效应[J].经济地理,2019(4):85-92
[3] 冯江茹. 人力资本对区域创新效率影响的实证研究[J].技术经济,2020(12):85-92
[4] Martin L, Thi T. The relationship between innovation and productivity based on R&D an ICT use: An empirical analysis of firms in Luxembourg[J].Revue Economique,2015(6):1105-1130
[5] 张骞,李长英. 信息化对区域创新绩效的直接效应和间接效应——兼论人力资本非线性中介作用[J].现代经济探讨,2019(2):113-121
[6] 黄栋,方宏,王益民. 国际化节奏视角下对外直接投资广度对创新绩效的影响研究[J].山东社会科学,2022(7):177-184
[7] 聂长飞,冯苑,张东. 创新型城市建设提高中国经济增长质量了吗[J].山西财经大学学报,2021(10):1-14
[8] 胡兆廉,石大千,司增绰. 创新型城市能否成为产业结构转型的“点睛之笔” ——来自国家创新型城市试点建设的证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2020(11):70-84
[9] 胡兆廉,聂长飞,石大千. 鱼和熊掌可否得兼?——创新型城市试点政策对城市产业集聚的影响[J].产业经济研究,2021(1):18-142
[10] 张华,丰超. 创新低碳之城:创新型城市建设的碳排放绩效评估[J].南方经济,2021(3):36-53
[11] 闫永生,李凌飞,邵传林. 金融改革对民营企业全要素生产率的影响——基于国家设立金融综合改革试验区的准自然实验[J].经济体制改革,2022(3):142-148
[12] 张超,钟昌标. 金融创新、产业结构变迁与经济高质量发展[J].江汉论坛,2021(4):5-16
[13] 庞敏,夏周培. 金融创新对产业结构升级的影响机制与效应分析——基于中介效应和空间效应的解析[J].工业技术经济,2020(9):30-38
[14] 王贤彬,王明灿,郑莉萍. 金融改革推动地方经济高质量发展了吗?——来自国家金融综合改革试验区设立的证据[J].经济社会体制比较,2020(4):11-20
[15] Ang J. Technological change and financial liberalization in South Korea[J].Journal of Macroeconomics,2010(1):457-468
[16] Wang J. The economic impact of special economic zones: Evidence from Chinese municipalities[J].Joural of Development Economics,2013(3):133-147
[17] 范从来,丁慧,张淦. 金融改革的方向:基于马克思借贷资本和现实资本理论的分析[J].当代经济管理,2016(4):5-58
[18] 庞敏,夏周培. 金融创新对产业结构升级的影响机制与效应分析——基于中介效应和空间效应的解析[J].工业技术经济,2020(9):30-38
[19] 方大春,马为彪. 中国区域创新与产业结构耦合协调度及其经济效率研究[J].当代经济管理,2019(7):50-58
[20] 赵庆. 产业结构优化升级能否促进技术创新效率? [J].科学学研究,2018(2):239-248
[21] 成鹏飞,刘念,王佳慧. 区域创新与产业结构优化升级耦合协调机理及时空演化——以湖南省14个市州为例)[J].中国科技论坛,2021(10):131-142
[22] 王锋,葛星. 低碳转型冲击就业吗——来自低碳城市试点的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):81-99
[23] Dang J, Motohashi K.Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in china? patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality[J].China Economic Review,2015(35):137-55
[24] 黎文靖,郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016(4):60-73
[25] 张翼,刘思,浓郑兴. 最低工资标准对城市创新能力的影响——对我国283个城市面板数据的实证研究[J].城市问题,2020(8):65-73
[26] 姜竹,徐思维,刘宁. 信息基础设施、公共服务供给效率与城市创新——基于“宽带中国”试点政策的实证研究[J].城市问题,2022(1):65-73
[27] 卞元超,吴利华,白俊红. 高铁开通是否促进了区域创新? [J].金融研究,2019(6):132-149
[28] 陈依曼,李立勋,符天蓝. 中国城市创新能力及其影响因素的空间分异——基于GWR模型的实证[J].热带地理,2020(2):323-334
[29] Alder S, Lin S, Zilibottl F. Economic reform and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities[J].Journal of Economic Growth,2016(4):305－349
[30] 张宽,黄凌云. 政府创新偏好与区域创新能力:如愿以偿还是事与愿违?[J].财政研究,2020(4):66-82
[31] 薛楚江,谢富纪. 政府人才政策、人力资本与区域创新[J].系统管理学报,2022(5):920-930
[32] 温忠麟,叶宝娟. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014(5):731-745
