Urban economic growth not only relies on the inputs of capital, labor and other factors, but also relies on both the “decentralization, regulation innovation, and services optimal” reform (“the DRISO reform” for short) and the construction of urban environment for doing business (“the UEDB construction”). Through the conceptual analysis of the DRISO reform and the UEDB construction, combined with the policy tools’ analysis of the DRISO reform and the scientific dimensions’ definition of the UEDB construction, this paper establishes a theoretical framework for the DRISO reform and the UEDB construction on urban economic growth. Meanwhile, based on evaluating the construction levels of urban environment for doing business in China’s 35 typical cities during 2003-2019 using the entropy method, combined with regression analysis, endogeneity treatment, and heterogeneity analysis, this paper analyzes the empirical relationships of the DRISO reform, the UEDB construction and urban economic growth from the perspective of total quantity and speed. Conclusions show that the UEDB construction will play an important role in urban economic growth, and the DRISO reform will promote urban economic growth through the optimization of the UEDB construction. Policy recommendations include: first, further promoting the DRISO reform and focusing on fully utilizing the effectiveness of its policy tools; Second, efforts should be made from both the subject and object of the UEDB construction to promote its overall level; Third, make multiple efforts to promote the deep integration of “decentralization”, “regulation innovation”, and “services optimal”, and further improve the levels of different scientific dimensions of the UEDB construction.
FAN Qiao
,
QU Xiao-dong
. The “Decentralization, Regulation Innovation, and Services Optimal” reform, business environment construction and urban economic growth[J]. Urban Problems, 2023
, 335(6)
: 46
-57
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230605
[1] 周慧.网红城市淄博一季度GDP过千亿,烧烤出圈拉动了多少消费?[N]. 21世纪经济报道,2023-05-09(006)
[2] 廖福崇.“放管服”改革、行政审批与营商环境——来自企业调查的经验证据[J].公共管理与政策评论,2019(6):80-96
[3] 王利明.负面清单管理模式与私法自治[J].中国法学,2014(5):26-40
[4] 朱奕蒙,毕青苗,徐现祥,等.商事制度改革与产业结构变迁:微观视角[J].经济研究,2022(1):189-208
[5] 汪旭晖,任晓雪.政府治理视角下平台电商信用监管的动态演化博弈研究[J].中国管理科学,2021(12):29-41
[6] 胡仙芝,刘海军.包容审慎监管:论新基建监管框架构建的过渡性和开放性[J].管理世界,2022(2):116-128
[7] 刘钊,孟繁元,满小欧,等.营商环境评估:理论与实践[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2018:24-30
[8] 付先凤,平文艺. 四川省可持续营商环境研究报告(2018-2019)[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2019:13-18
[9] 柳立子,赵安然,刘佳.广州法治化营商环境研究[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2021:124-133
[10] 李志军.2020·中国城市营商环境评价[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2021:33-42
[11] 廖福崇.审批制度改革优化了城市营商环境吗?——基于民营企业家“忙里又忙外”的实证分析[J].公共管理学报,2020(1):47-58
[12] “中国城市营商环境评价研究”课题组.中国城市营商环境评价的理论逻辑、比较分析及对策建议[J].管理世界,2021(5):98-112
[13] 李志军.2020·中国城市营商环境评价[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2021:196-202
[14] Reinert E S. How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor [M]. New York: Public Affairs, 2008:1-100
[15] 毕世杰,马春文.发展经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999:19-38
[16] 吉拉德.M.米耶,都德莱.西尔斯编,刘鹤等译.经济发展理论的十位大师[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2013:115-144
[17] 林毅夫,等.新结构经济学研习方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2021:220-260
[18] 董志强,魏下海,汤灿晴.制度软环境与经济发展——基于30个大城市营商环境的经验研究[J].管理世界,2012(4):9-20
[19] 杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020(9):141-155
[20] 谢赤,钟赞.熵权法在银行经营绩效综合评价中的应用[J].中国软科学,2002(9):109-111
[21] 程启月.评测指标权重确定的结构熵权法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010(7):1225-1228
[22] 章穗,张梅,迟国泰.基于熵权法的科学技术评价模型及其实证研究[J].管理学报,2010(1):34-42