Currently, carbon emissions trading has become an important market-based environmental regulation tool for achieving low-carbon development in China. Based on the policy diffusion theory, a DPSIR-based carbon trading system diffusion model is constructed from the perspective of officials' trade-offs, and an event history analysis is used to empirically examine the logic of system diffusion and its inner mechanism of action since the pilot policy of carbon emissions trading system in 2011. It is found that: there are obvious spatial and temporal divergent features in the diffusion of carbon trading system, among which the pilot regions and eastern regions have faster system diffusion and higher system adoption rate. The results of the sub-dimensions show that: in the pressure perception factor dimension, political, social and financial environmental pressure are important factors influencing provincial government officials' adoption of carbon trading policies; in the state evaluation dimension, social status is also an important decision basis for officials' decisions; in the compatibility dimension, public participation environmental regulation tools have no significant influence on carbon trading policy adoption.
XUE Yang and Colleagues
. Study on the diffusion mechanism of China's carbon emission trading system: An event history analysis based on the logic of macro-micro interaction[J]. Urban Problems, 2023
, 336(7)
: 43
-52
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230705
[1] Wejnert B . Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework[J]. Annual Review of Sociology,2003(28):297-326
[2] 吕宣如,章晓懿.多重逻辑视角下政府购买居家养老服务政策扩散研究——基于中国省份数据的事件史分析[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2022(4):54-63,117
[3] 王班班,莫琼辉,钱浩祺.地方环境政策创新的扩散模式与实施效果——基于河长制政策扩散的微观实证[J].中国工业经济,2020(8):99-117
[4] 朱多刚,胡振吉.中央政府推进政策扩散的方式研究——以廉租房政策为例[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2017(4):378-384
[5] Hallett T,Ventresca M J. Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in gouldner's patterns of industrial bureaucracy[J]. Theory & Society, 2006(35):213-236
[6] 朱亚鹏,丁淑娟.政策属性与中国社会政策创新的扩散研究[J].社会学研究,2016(5):88-113,243
[7] 郑云坚,吴施娟.我国碳排放权交易管理沿革与发展探析[J].中国行政管理,2022(2):159-160
[8] Maosheng D,Zhiyu T,Yongqiang Z,et al. Interactions and coordination between carbon emissions trading and other direct carbon mitigation policies in China[J]. Energy Research & Social Science,2017(33):59-69
[9] 余珮,吴珂晗.市场激励型环境规制是否引致对外直接投资?——基于中国碳排放权交易试点政策的准自然实验[J].生态经济,2022(8):24-31,49
[10] 尹迎港,常向东.中国碳排放权交易政策促进了地区绿色全要素生产率的提升吗？[J].金融与经济,2022(3):60-70
[11] 董直庆,王辉.市场型环境规制政策有效性检验——来自碳排放权交易政策视角的经验证据[J].统计研究,2021(10):48-61
[12] Sun W ,Zhang C . Analysis and forecasting of the carbon price using multi-resolution singular value decomposition and extreme learning machine optimized by adaptive whale optimization algorithm[J]. Applied Energy,2018:1354-1371
[13] 田园,陈伟,宋维明.基于GARCH-EVT-VaR模型的国际主要碳排放权交易市场风险度量研究[J].科技管理研究,2015(2):224-231
[14] Liao Z . Environmental policy instruments. Environmental innovation and the reputation of enterprises[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018(2):1111-1117
[15] Lawrence A B,Kevin R C. Empirical regularities in the diffusion of innovation[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1971(3):551-559
[16] Mohr L B . Determinants of innovation in organizations[J]. American Political Science Review,1969(1):111-126
[17] Berry F S,Berry W D. Theories of the policy process[J]. Economics,2019:223-260
[18] Hwang S D ,Gray V . External limits and internal determinants of state public policy[J]. Political Research Quarterly,1991(2):277-298
[19] Shipan C R,Volden C. The mechanisms of policy diffusion[J]. American Journal of Political Science,2008(4):840-857
[20] Strang D. Learning by Example: Imitation and Innovation at a Global Bank[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,2010
[21] Everett M R,Arvind S, Margaret M Q. Diffusion of Innovations (5th edition)[M]. New York:The Free Press,2003:11-12
[22] 吴克昌,吴楚泓.重大突发公共卫生事件背景下政策响应速度差异研究——基于283个城市复工复产政策的事件史分析[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):67-81
[23] Jack L W. The diffusion of innovations among the American States [J]. American Political Science Association,2012(3):880-899
[24] 刘鹏,张伊静.中国式政策示范效果及其影响因素——基于两个示范城市建设案例的比较研究[J].行政论坛,2020(6):65-73
[25] 韩万渠.中国网络问政创新扩散过程研究:以注意力理论为分析框架[J].中共浙江省委党校学报,2015(3):54-60
[26] 胡丽娜,薛阳.财政分权对区域创新活跃度激励效应及传导机制研究[J].经济经纬,2021(2):14-22
[27] Zhu X. Mandate versus championship : Vertical government intervention and diffusion of innovation in public services in authoritarian China[J]. Public Management Review,2013(1):117-139
[28] 王业强,李豫.中央环保督察促进地区产业结构升级了吗？——一个地方政府竞争的视角[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):19-30
[29] 王华春,刘腾飞,崔伟.财政环保支出、地方政府竞争与环境污染治理——基于中国284个城市的实证研究[J].城市问题,2022(4):96-103
[30] 陈钊,徐彤.走向“为和谐而竞争”:晋升锦标赛下的中央和地方治理模式变迁[J].世界经济,2011(9):3-18
[31] 张彩云,陈岑.地方政府竞争对环境规制影响的动态研究——基于中国式分权视角[J].南开经济研究,2018(4):137-157
[32] 张文彬,张理芃,张可云.中国环境规制强度省际竞争形态及其演变——基于两区制空间Durbin固定效应模型的分析[J].管理世界,2010(12):34-44
[33] 陈景云,许崇涛.河长制在省(区、市)间扩散的进程与机制转变——基于时间、空间与层级维度的考察[J].环境保护,2018(14):49-54
[34] 张则行,何精华.党的十八大以来我国环境管理体制的重塑路径研究——基于组织“内部控制”视角的分析框架[J].中国行政管理,2020(7):22-27
[35] 张国兴,林伟纯,郎玫.中央环保督察下的地方环境治理行为发生机制——基于30个案例的fsQCA分析[J].管理评论,2021(7):326-336
[36] 赵琦,朱常海.社会参与及治理转型:美国环境运动的发展特点及其启示[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(3):57-66
[37] 姜楠.环保财政支出有助于实现经济和环境双赢吗?[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2018(1):95-103
[38] 曹鸿杰,卢洪友,潘星宇.地方政府环境支出行为的空间策略互动研究——传导机制与再检验[J].经济理论与经济管理,2020(1):55-68
[39] 史亚东.公众环境关心、中央环保督察与地方环保支出——采用空间双重差分模型的实证分析[J].西部论坛,2022(1):66-82
[40] 程聪慧,褚清清.创业投资政府引导基金政策扩散研究——基于全国31省数据的事件史分析[J].南方经济,2022(1):115-130
[41] 韩啸,魏程瑞.风险如何影响政策扩散?——以环境信息公开为例[J].公共管理与政策评论,2021(5):95-104
[42] 臧晓霞,吕建华.国家治理逻辑演变下中国环境管制取向:由“控制”走向“激励”[J].公共行政评论,2017(5):105-128,218
[43] 李小平,余东升,余娟娟.异质性环境规制对碳生产率的空间溢出效应——基于空间杜宾模型[J].中国软科学,2020(4):82-96
[44] 朱多刚,郭俊华.专利资助政策的创新与扩散:面向中国省份的事件史分析[J].公共行政评论,2016(5):64-83,205
[45] 包健,郭宝棋.异质性环境规制对区域生态效率的影响研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022(2):25-30
