Supervision intensity, reward-punishment system, and urban residents' household waste classification behavior:A case study of Beijing

  • ZHANG Zhuo-wei ,
  • ZHAO Xia
Expand

Received date: 2023-06-01

  Revised date: 2023-06-22

  Online published: 2023-09-19

Abstract

The pilot policy of urban living Waste sorting classification has been implemented for four years, and the supervision and reward and punishment system is widely used in many places, but there are still problems such as constraint failure and limited effect. By establishing a game theory model to propose hypotheses, selecting residents from the six main urban areas of Beijing as the research subjects,and using double threshold Logit regression and moderating effect regression methods for empirical testing. The study found that both supervision and reward and punishment systems can effectively promote the Waste sorting of residents, and the combination of reward and punishment systems has a stronger promotion effect. Further analysis shows that the marginal promoting effect of supervision on residents' participation in Waste sorting is decreasing, and it is a negative regulating variable of the reward and punishment system, and has a stronger negative regulating effect on the punishment system. Among the control variables, environmental awareness and garbage can facilities can positively promote residents' participation in classification, while tenants' Waste sorting behavior is relatively poor. Therefore, it is proposed that the combination of reward and punishment system should be emphasized to promote Waste sorting; While implementing the reward and punishment system, measures such as moderately relaxing supervision to better play the role of institutional combinations should be taken. At the same time, it is still necessary to increase the publicity of Waste sorting, improve Waste sorting facilities, and strengthen the management and guidance of tenants.

Cite this article

ZHANG Zhuo-wei , ZHAO Xia . Supervision intensity, reward-punishment system, and urban residents' household waste classification behavior:A case study of Beijing[J]. Urban Problems, 2023 , 336(7) : 84 -92 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230709

References

[1] 李颖,武学,孙成双,等.基于低碳发展的北京城市生活垃圾处理模式优化[J].资源科学,2021(8):1574-1588
[2] 孟小燕.基于结构方程的居民生活垃圾分类行为研究[J].资源科学,2019(6):1111-1119
[3] 田华文.中国城市生活垃圾管理政策的演变及未来走向[J].城市问题,2015(8):82-89
[4] 董飞,扶漪红,吴笑天,等.城市生活垃圾分类治理:现实困境与实践进路[J].城市发展研究,2021(2):110-116
[5] 陶凤,冉黎黎. 参与率超九成 垃圾分类晒两年成绩单[N]. 北京商报,2022-05-20(2)
[6] 郭施宏,李阳.城市生活垃圾强制分类政策执行逻辑研究[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2022(1):60-70
[7] 王天淇. 垃圾分类“三大问题”还需重点解决[N]. 北京日报,2021-08-04(6)
[8] 梁鹏,孙晓雨.经济学视角下的“两型社会”建设——由北京“垃圾分类”引发的经济学思考[J].商业经济研究,2021(4):190-192
[9] 彭韵,李蕾,彭绪亚,等.我国生活垃圾分类发展历程?障碍及对策[J].中国环境科学,2018(10):3874-3879
[10] 杜春林,黄涛珍.从政府主导到多元共治:城市生活垃圾分类的治理困境与创新路径[J].行政论坛,2019(4):116-121
[11] 李馨予,葛恩燕,尹筱思,等.无废城市垃圾分类均衡推进的政策执行困境及对策[J].中国环境科学,2022(9):4232-4239
[12] 陈那波,蔡荣.“试点”何以失败?——A市生活垃圾“计量收费”政策试行过程研究[J].社会学研究,2017(2):174-198+245
[13] 孙岩,胡茗,张备.政策工具视角下上海生活垃圾分类政策文本量化[J].资源科学,2021(11):2224-2235
[14] 张蓓佳.城市垃圾分类政策路径与效能——以西北地区试点城市为例[J].资源科学,2023(1):105-117
[15] 丁志华,张鑫,王亚维.信息激励对垃圾分类意愿的影响研究[J].中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(6):87-100
[16] 刘余,朱红根,张利民.信息干预可以提高农村居民生活垃圾分类效果吗——来自太湖流域农户行为实验的证据[J].农业技术经济,2023(1):112-126
[17] 王树文,文学娜,秦龙.中国城市生活垃圾公众参与管理与政府管制互动模型构建[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014(4):142-148
[18] Tang D, Shi L, Huang X, et al. Influencing factors on the household-waste-classification behavior of urban residents: a case study in Shanghai[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022(11): 6528
[19] Govindan K, Zhuang Y, Chen G. Analysis of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior: A case study of Shanghai[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 349: 131126
[20] Martire F, Barbanera L, Floridi F, et al. Urban housing and social capital as key factors in implementation of recycling policy: The case study of the new recycling program in Rome[J]. Italian Sociological Review, 2022(2):37-52
[21] Wu Z, Zhang Y, Chen Q, et al. Attitude of Chinese public towards municipal solid waste sorting policy: A text mining study[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 756: 142674
[22] 韦海燕.产权理论视角下提高生活垃圾分类效果的研究[J].中国资源综合利用,2021 (4):42-46+55
[23] 宋成校,朱红根,张利民.农村居民生活垃圾分类行为与意愿悖离研究——基于制度约束与社会规范的视角[J].干旱区资源与环境,2023(6):73-80
[24] 初钊鹏,卞晨,刘昌新,等.雾霾污染、规制治理与公众参与的演化仿真研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019 (7):101-111
[25] 周晔馨,涂勤,胡必亮.惩罚、社会资本与条件合作——基于传统实验和人为田野实验的对比研究[J].经济研究,2014(10):125-138
[26] 唐林,罗小锋,张俊飚.社会监督、群体认同与农户生活垃圾集中处理行为——基于面子观念的中介和调节作用[J].中国农村观察,2019 (2):18-33
[27] 朱宁,秦富.农村生活垃圾源头分类的困境及破解对策[J].环境保护,2023(Z1):49-51
[28] 黄炎忠,罗小锋,闫阿倩.不同奖惩方式对农村居民生活垃圾集中处理行为与效果的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021 (2):1-7
[29] 秦颖,王先甲,杨文俊.基于委托代理理论的泥沙资源化政府激励与监督机制设计[J].管理工程学报,2022(6):129-143
[30] 张再生,李鑫涛.新时代公共管理实现途径的多元化演变分析[J].行政论坛,2019(5):83-91
[31] 朱宁,魏同洋,秦富.农村居民生活垃圾治理费支付意愿与支付水平分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023(4):132-139
[32] Chen F, Chen H, Jin Y, et al. Impact of cognition on waste separation behavior-Nonlinear moderating effect by trustworthiness for links[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 296: 126525
[33] Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference[J]. Journal of econometrics, 1999 (2): 345-368
[34] 陈绍军,李如春,马永斌.意愿与行为的悖离:城市居民生活垃圾分类机制研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015 (9):168-176
Outlines

/

〈 〉