Based on the research perspective of population agglomeration, using the panel data of 113 resource-based cities from 2006 to 2020, this paper empirically analyzes the influence effect and mechanism of quality of place on industrial structure transformation in resource-based cities, and comprehensively investigates its heterogeneous effect by combining urban attributes such as geographical location, development stage and development type with quality attributes such as life, safety, society, humanities and creativity. The results show that, compared with natural quality of place, the improvement of artificial quality of place has a stronger effect on the industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities. Great social quality and creative quality are important factors to promote the industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities. In terms of urban types, the artificial quality of place has a significant positive impact on the rationalization of industrial structure of resource-based cities in the east and south, and has a stronger effect on the advanced industrial structure of mature and renewable resource-based cities, and has a significant promotion effect on the rationalization of industrial structure of coal, forest industry and comprehensive cities. In terms of mechanism, the influence of artificial quality of place on the industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities is mainly conducted through two paths: talent concentration effect and productivity growth effect, and the local market amplification effect has not yet appeared.
LI Na
,
ZHAO Kang-jie
,
JING Pu-qiu
. Quality of place and industrial structure transformation of resource-based cities: Based on the perspective of population agglomeration[J]. Urban Problems, 2023
, 333(4)
: 55
-67
.
DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230406
[1] 陈妍,梅林,胡宇娜.东北资源型城市转型过程中产业结构升级演变研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016(12):20-27
[2] 赵洋.我国资源型城市产业绿色转型效率研究——基于地级资源型城市面板数据实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2019(7):94-101
[3] 李博,秦欢,孙威.产业转型升级与绿色全要素生产率提升的互动关系——基于中国116个地级资源型城市的实证研究[J].自然资源学报,2022(1):186-199
[4] 杨桐彬,朱英明,王念.东北地区资源型城市产业结构升级的战略效应[J].商业研究,2020(4):78-84
[5] 彭飞,金慧晴.区域产业政策有效性评估——基于中国资源型和老工业城市的证据[J].产业经济研究,2021(3):99-111
[6] 李虹,邹庆.环境规制、资源禀赋与城市产业转型研究——基于资源型城市与非资源型城市的对比分析[J].经济研究,2018(11):182-198
[7] 秦炳涛,余润颖,葛力铭.环境规制对资源型城市产业结构转型的影响[J].中国环境科学,2021(7):3427-3440
[8] 裴耀琳,郭淑芬.资源禀赋约束下生产性服务业集聚的产业结构调整效应研究——基于资源型城市与非资源型城市的对比分析[J].软科学,2021(1):62-67
[9] 曾刚,陆琳忆,何金廖.生态创新对资源型城市产业结构与工业绿色效率的影响[J].资源科学,2021(1):94-103
[10] 张荣佳,付琳,孙晓华.地理区位、经济区位与资源型城市产业转型[J].宏观经济研究,2022(7):88-104,119
[11] 毛成刚,杨国佐,范瑞.数字金融与资源型地区产业结构转型升级——基于109个资源型城市的实证分析[J].经济问题,2022(7):63-70
[12] Ullman E L. Amenities as a factor in regional growth[J]. Geographical Review, 1954(1): 119-132
[13] Glaeser E L, Shapiro J M. Urban growth in the 1990s: Is city living back?[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2003(1): 139-165
[14] 杨开忠,范博凯,董亚宁.空间品质、创新活力与中国城市生产率[J].经济管理,2022(1):47-64
[15] 顾芸,董亚宁.地方品质对异质性劳动力流动的影响——基于中国CMDS微观调查数据的分析[J].财经科学,2021(11):80-92
[16] 张超,陈思,兰宗敏.地方品质与区域创新:直接影响、溢出效应与空间差异[J].中国软科学,2022(7):82-93
[17] 刘修岩,李松林.房价、迁移摩擦与中国城市的规模分布——理论模型与结构式估计[J].经济研究,2017(7):65-78
[18] 宫攀,张槊,王文哲.人口视角下中国城市收缩的演变特征与时空格局——基于第七次全国人口普查公报数据的分析[J].人口与经济,2022(3):1-15
[19] 武优勐,王鹏帆,毛中根.城市消费舒适物的产业结构升级效应研究——基于人才集聚的中介作用[J].浙江工商大学学报,2022(2):111-124
[20] 欧晓静,李红.异质性劳动力集聚与产业结构升级——基于我国地级市面板数据的实证研究[J].城市问题,2021(4):74-86
[21] 杨丽君,邵军.中国区域产业结构优化的再估算[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018(10):59-77
[22] 靖学青.城镇化、环境规制与产业结构优化——基于长江经济带面板数据的实证研究[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2020(3):119-128
[23] 王帅.资源型地区的治理困境与转型发展路径选择[J].经济问题,2015(9):117-120
[24] 李荣杰,李娜,张静,等.地区能源结构低碳化差异的收敛机制及影响因素——基于加权多维向量夹角指数[J].统计与信息论坛,2020(10):90-99
[25] 干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011(5):4-16,31
[26] 张平,张鹏鹏.房价、劳动力异质性与产业结构升级[J].当代经济科学,2016(2):87-93,127
[27] 种照辉,高志红,覃成林.网络基础设施建设与城市间合作创新——“宽带中国”试点及其推广的证据[J].财经研究,2022(3):79-93
[28] 郝晓伟,杨曦,闵维方.“资源诅咒”是否会挤出教育投入?[J].教育与经济,2022(1):78-88
