本刊特稿

大学与地方经济增长——来自我国“双一流”大学新校区的证据

  • 刘修岩 ,
  • 王峤
展开
刘修岩(1979—),男,山东济宁人,东南大学经济管理学院教授,副院长,博士,主要研究方向为区域与城市经济学
王峤(1993—),男,江苏南京人,暨南大学产业经济研究院副教授,博士,主要研究方向为区域与城市经济学。

收稿日期: 2024-12-30

  修回日期: 2025-02-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-16

基金资助

国家社科基金重大项目(22&ZD066)——“新发展格局下长三角一体化大市场研究”;国家自然科学基金青年项目(72403102)——“城市空间形态影响收入不平等的理论机制与效应识别研究”。

Universities and local economic growth:Evidence from the new campuses of China’s “Double First-Class” Universities

  • LIU Xiu-yan ,
  • WANG Qiao
Expand

Received date: 2024-12-30

  Revised date: 2025-02-09

  Online published: 2025-05-16

摘要

自1999年高等教育扩招政策实施以来,我国高校面临空间扩张压力,在应对压力的驱动下逐步兴起新校区建设浪潮,地方政府也将引入新的大学校区资源作为激活区域经济活力、推动当地经济增长的战略抓手。采用本地化尺度的空间双重差分方法和基于卷积神经网络的反事实匹配空间双重差分方法,从区位导向性政策视角分析我国“双一流”大学新校区设立对地方经济增长的影响。研究结果表明,新校区的设立切实促进了地方经济活动的增长,但对周边地区的土地和住房的商业价值提升作用相对有限。其主要原因在于,尽管新校区的立激发了地方知识的溢出,推动了地方产业结构转型,促进了高科技产业集聚,但新校区周围的本地商业化服务业和便利设施的配套尚不完善,难以在更大地理尺度上发挥新校区的正外部性,进一步释放发展潜力。此外,地方政府大量划拨房地产用地的发展模式,也可能是限制新校区发挥作用的一个重要影响因素。基于研究结论,提出针对性对策建议,以期为推动未来我国大学新校区与城市区域的协同联动发展提供决策参考。

本文引用格式

刘修岩 , 王峤 . 大学与地方经济增长——来自我国“双一流”大学新校区的证据[J]. 城市问题, 2025 , 355(2) : 4 -15 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.250201

Abstract

Since the expansion of university enrollment in 1999, Chinese higher education institutions have faced pressure for spatial expansion, leading to the establishment of new campuses across various regions. Concurrently, local governments have aimed to stimulate regional economic growth by attracting these new university campuses. This study employs a localized spatial difference-in-differences (Donuts DiD) method and a convolutional neural network-based counterfactual matching spatial Difference-in-Differences (CNN-Matching Donuts DiD) approach to analyze the impact of establishing “Double First-Class” university campuses on local economic growth from the perspective of location-oriented policies. The findings indicate that the establishment of new campuses has indeed promoted the growth of local economic activities.However, its effect on enhancing the commercial value of surrounding land and housing is relatively limited. The primary reasons are that, although the new campuses have stimulated local knowledge spillover activities, driven the transformation of local industrial structures, and facilitated the agglomeration of high-tech industries, the surrounding areas still lack adequate local commercial services and amenities, making it difficult to further amplify the positive externalities of the new campuses on a larger geographical scale. Additionally, the development model wherein local governments allocate substantial real estate land may also be a significant influencing factor. This research provides empirical support for promoting the coordinated and interactive development of future university campuses and urban regions in China.

参考文献

[1] 陈晓光.教育、创新与经济增长[J].经济研究,2006(10):18-29
[2] Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research[J]. American Economic Review, 1989, 79: 957-970
[3] 白俊红,蒋伏心.协同创新、空间关联与区域创新绩效[J].经济研究,2015(7):174-187
[4] Fischer M, Varga A. Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria[J]. Annals of Regional Science, 2003, 37:303-322
[5] Andersson R, Quigley J, Wilhelmsson M. University decentralization as regional policy: The Swedish experiment[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2004(4):371-388
[6] Andersson R, Quigley J, Wilhelmsson M. Urbanization, productivity, and innovation: Evidence from investment in higher education[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2009(1):0-15
[7] Li J, Liu S, Wu Y. Identifying Knowledge Spillovers from Universities:Quasi-experimental Evidence from Urban China[R]. Available at SSRN 3621422, 2020
[8] Liu X, Zhu F, Wang Q. More Than a New Campus: University’s Spatial Expansion,Emerging Knowledge Cluster, and Innovation Growth[R]. Available at SSRN 4283558, 2022
[9] Duranton G, Henderson V, Strange W. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000
[10] Ponds R, Oort F, Frenken K. The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2010(3):423-443
[11] Audretsch D, Feldman M. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J]. American Economic Review, 1996(3):630-640
[12] Woodward D, Figueiredo O, Guimaraes P. Beyond the Silicon Valley: University R&D and high-technology location[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2006(1):0-32
[13] 郭泉恩,孙斌栋.高校知识溢出对我国高技术产业创新的影响研究——基于省级区域的空间计量分析[J].世界地理研究,2017(4):82-92
[14] Bonaccorsi A, Colombo M G, Guerini M, et al.University specialization and new firm creation across industries[J]. Small Business Economics, 2013, 41:837-863
[15] Hausman N. University Innovation, Local Economic Growth, and Entrepreneurship[R]. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-12-10., 2012
[16] Andrews M J. How do institutions of higher education affect local invention?Evidence from the establishment of US colleges[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2023(2):1-41
[17] 梁俊伟,黄德成.高校知识溢出与企业创新绩效[J].经济理论与经济管理,2020(1):82-96
[18] Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers: An evidenced by patent citations[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 434:578-598
[19] Krugman P. Increasing returns and economic geography[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1991(3):483-499
[20] Lehnert P, Dell M, Backes-Gellner U, et al. The Effect of Postsecondary Educational Institutions on Local Economies: A Bird’s-Eye View[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 2024
[21] 周茂,李雨浓,姚星,等.人力资本扩张与中国城市制造业出口升级:来自高校扩招的证据[J].管理世界,2019(5):64-77,198-199
[22] Russell L C, Yu L, Andrews M J. Higher education and local educational attainment: Evidence from the establishment of US colleges[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2024(4):1146-1156
[23] 刘灿雷,高超.教育、人力资本与创新——基于“量”与“质”的双重考察[J].财贸经济,2021(5):110-126
[24] Hu A, Hibel J. Increasing heterogeneity in the economic returns to higher education in urban China[J]. The Social Science Journal, 2015(3):322-330
[25] Wang Y, Tang W.Universities and the formation of edge cities: Evidence from China’s government‐led university town construction[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2020(1):245-265
[26] Neumark D, Simpson H. Place-Based Policies[M]. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, 5: 1197-1287
[27] Lu Y, Wang J, Zhu L. Place-based policies, creation, and agglomeration economies:Evidence from China’s economic zone program[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2019(3):325-360
[28] Lu F, Sun W, Wu J. Special economic zones and human capital investment: 30 years of evidence from China[J]. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2023(3):35-64
[29] 傅利平,涂俊.市场因素、空间特征对大学创新和知识溢出的影响[J].管理学报,2014(10):1499-1506
[30] 傅利平,涂俊.技术转移视角下大学对企业技术创新的空间知识溢出效应研究[J].研究与发展管理,2015(2):56-64
[31] Carlino G, Kerr W. Agglomeration and Innovation[M]. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, 5: 349-404
[32] Kantor S, Whalley A. Knowledge spillovers from research universities: Evidence from endowment value shocks[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014(1):171-188
[33] Nunn N,Puga D. Ruggedness: The blessing of bad geography in Africa[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2012(1):20-36
[34] Pope D, Pope J. When Walmart comes to town: Always low housing prices? Always?[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2015(5):1-13
[35] Greenstone M, Hornbeck R, Moretti E. Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2010(3):536-598
[36] Harari M. Cities in bad shape: Urban geometry in India[J]. American Economic Review, 2020(8):2377-2421
文章导航

/

〈 〉