存量提质阶段城市“三生”空间规模结构:理论框架与优化策略
收稿日期: 2026-01-03
修回日期: 2026-02-12
网络出版日期: 2026-06-10
基金资助
国家社会科学基金重大项目——“中国城市生产、生活、生态空间优化研究”(17ZDA069)
Scale structure of urban“ production-living-ecological” space in the stage of stock improvement and quality enhancement:Theoretical framework and optimization strategies
在城市发展转向存量提质阶段的背景下,优化“三生”空间规模结构成为高质量发展的核心命题。构建“生态规模约束—功能比例适配—内部结构协同”的理论分析框架,基于多源数据揭示中国城市空间结构的深层矛盾。研究表明,当前,中国城市“三生”空间的主要矛盾已从总量规模短缺转向结构性比例失调,生态空间虽守住规模管控底线,但整体质量仍然偏低,建设空间在宏观层面表现为保障支撑比例失衡与产居结构分化、在微观层面陷入内部结构扭曲与服务供需脱节的困境。据此提出“锁定规模边界—纠偏宏观比例—重构内部结构”的递进式优化范式,并从精准治理视角指出,应加快关键结构指标的关系研究,构建标准制定与量化支撑体系,从而为推动城市空间治理从经验判断向精准量化转型提供科学依据。
鲁达非 , 江曼琦 . 存量提质阶段城市“三生”空间规模结构:理论框架与优化策略[J]. 城市问题, 2026 , 367(2) : 4 -13 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.260201
As urban development shifts to the stage of stock improvement and quality enhancement, optimizing the scale structure of “production-living-ecological” space has become a core issue for high-quality development. This study constructs a theoretical analytical framework of “ecological scale constraint - functional proportional adaptation - internal structure coordination” and reveals the underlying contradictions in China’s urban spatial structure based on multi-source spatial data. The results show that the main contradiction of “production-living-ecological” space in Chinese cities has shifted comprehensively from total scale shortage to structural proportional imbalance. Although ecological space maintains the bottom line of scale control, its overall quality remains low. At the macro level, construction space exhibits imbalanced supporting space and a differentiated production-residence structure; at the micro level, it falls into internal structural mismatch and a disconnection between service supply and demand at the micro level. Accordingly, a progressive optimization paradigm of “locking scale boundaries - correcting macro proportions - restructuring internal structure” is proposed. Furthermore, from the perspective of precise governance, it is suggested to accelerate the standard transformation of key structural indicators and the construction of a quantitative support foundation, so as to provide a scientific basis for promoting the transformation of spatial governance from empirical judgment to precise quantification.
| 1 | 中共中央文献研究室.十八大以来重要文献选编(上)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2014:597 |
| 2 | 习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜 为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[J].前线,2022(11):4-28 |
| 3 | 习近平.推动我国生态文明建设迈上新台阶[J].求是,2019(3):4-19 |
| 4 | 中共中央党史和文献研究院.十八大以来重要文献选编(下)[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2018:89,79 |
| 5 | 国务院正式批复《河北雄安新区总体规划(2018—2035年)》[J].中国勘察设计,2019(1):12 |
| 6 | United Nations Environment Programme. Nature-based solutions for urban challenges[EB/OL]. (2021-04-26)[2026-02-05]. |
| 7 | 济南新旧动能转换先行区管理委员会.济南新旧动能转换先行区建设项目 绿色生态建设服务规程(试行)[EB/OL].(2020-04-29)[2025-08-16]. |
| 8 | 四川天府新区 山水人城和谐相融的公园城市先行区[N].成都日报,2023-07-28(5) |
| 9 | 曹国华,王凯,翁轶.江苏省蓝绿空间占比现状及优化建议[J].林草政策研究,2022(3):22-26 |
| 10 | 江曼琦,赵佩佩.产业用地结构对生产空间利用效率影响研究——基于用地比价失衡与产业升级视角[J].南开经济研究,2025(1):162-182 |
| 11 | 靳文博,翟国方,何仲禹,等.基于有序Logistic 回归的城市总体规划建设用地指标与城市居民主观幸福感间关系研究[J].国际城市规划,2018(6):110-117 |
| 12 | 张景帆,江曼琦.城市用地水平、布局结构与“三生空间”利用质量——基于中国283个城市的实证研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2024(11):14-28 |
| 13 | 国家新型城镇化规划(2014—2020年)[N].人民日报,2014-03-17(9) |
| 14 | 方创琳,李广东,张蔷.中国城市建设用地的动态变化态势与调控[J].自然资源学报,2017(3):363-376 |
| 15 | 江曼琦,田伟腾.中国大都市15分钟社区生活圈功能配置特征、趋势与发展策略研究——以京津沪为例[J].河北学刊,2022(2):140-150 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |