社区违建治理关系到基层治理体系与治理能力现代化建设的质量与水平。基于多重制度逻辑分析框架，分析四川省Y市H社区违建现象的生成逻辑及其治理困境。研究发现，在社区违建治理中，政府遵从行政—科层逻辑，开发商遵从市场—资本逻辑，违建业主遵从个体—理性逻辑，维权业主遵从社群—公约逻辑，物业公司遵从中介—经营逻辑，且五种逻辑之间存在张力。社区违建现象的发生是市场—资本逻辑、行政—科层逻辑、个体—理性逻辑相互作用的结果，反映了在城镇化快速发展背景下个体利益扩张与公共秩序维护之间的深层矛盾。社区违建治理困境的根源在于同一治理场域内多重制度逻辑的结构性不兼容，各主体之间利益诉求的差异导致违建治理面临僵局。基于此，社区违建治理的关键在于推进协同治理，通过构建权威在场的协商平台划定规则边界，优化利益相容的执行体系，以化解逻辑冲突，实现法理与情理融合的监督闭环。

The governance of community violation construction is related to the quality and level of the modernization of grass-roots governance system and governance capacity. Based on an analytical framework based on multiple institutional logic， this paper analyzes the generation logic of construction violation phenomena and its governance dilemmas in H Community， Y City， Sichuan Province. The study found that in community construction violation governance， the government follows the administrative-bureaucratic logic， developers follow the market-capital logic， construction violation owners follow the individual-rational logic， rights advocates follow the community-contract logic， property companies follow the intermediary-operating logic， and the five logics are mutually constrained and there are tensions. The occurrence of community construction violation phenomena is the result of the interaction of market-capital logic， administrative-bureaucratic logic， and individual-rational logic， reflecting the deep contradiction between the expansion of individual interests and the maintenance of public order in the context of rapid urbanization. The deep roots of community violation governance dilemmas lie in the structural incompatibility of multiple institutional logic within the same governance field： differentiated interest claims among various entities lead to violation governance facing a stalemate. Based on this， the key to community violation governance lies in promoting collaborative governance， defining rule boundaries through the construction of authoritative-presented negotiation platforms， optimizing interest-compliant enforcement systems to resolve logical conflicts， and perfecting the supervisory closed loop of the fusion of jurisprudence and common sense.