城市科学

中国四大城市群的投资网络空间结构与演化特征——基于全国海量工商企业信息数据的分析

  • 陆军 ,
  • 孙翔宇 ,
  • 毛文峰
展开
陆军(1971—),男,山东招远人,北京大学政府管理学院副院长,教授,博士研究生导师,主要研究方向为城市经济与城市管理;孙翔宇(1999—),男,河南周口人,北京大学政府管理学院硕士研究生,主要研究方向为城市与区域经济;毛文峰(1993—),男,湖南邵阳人,北京大学政府管理学院博士研究生,主要研究方向为城市与区域经济。

收稿日期: 2023-01-06

  修回日期: 2023-03-11

  网络出版日期: 2023-09-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(42171174)。

Spatial structure and evolutionary characteristics of investment networks in China's four major urban agglomerations:Based on the national massive information data of industrial and commercial enterprises

  • LU Jun ,
  • SUN Xiang-yu ,
  • MAO Wen-feng
Expand

Received date: 2023-01-06

  Revised date: 2023-03-11

  Online published: 2023-09-19

摘要

企业市场互动网络是城市网络的重要表现形式。基于全国海量工商企业信息数据库,以中国四大城市群——京津冀、长三角、珠三角和成渝为研究对象,利用大数据匹配方法,构建了城市群企业跨城投资有向加权网络,并对投资网络的空间结构与演化特征进行了分析。主要研究结论如下:2010—2019年,四大城市群投资网络规模与密度均呈现一定的增长趋势。在空间格局方面,京津冀城市群呈现以石家庄—北京—天津为中心的倒“V”型结构,长三角城市群呈现以上海为核心的多轴式发展,珠三角城市群呈菱形结构稳定发展,成渝城市群呈现出成都—重庆双核联动、成都单核辐射的空间格局。从城市层级来看,四大城市群投资网络的“核心—边缘”结构特征明显,但城市节点层级存在显著的异质性。

本文引用格式

陆军 , 孙翔宇 , 毛文峰 . 中国四大城市群的投资网络空间结构与演化特征——基于全国海量工商企业信息数据的分析[J]. 城市问题, 2023 , 333(4) : 21 -31 . DOI: 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.230403

Abstract

In recent years, urban network relationships based on factor linkages have received widespread attention from economic geographers. Based on the information database of industrial and commercial enterprises, this paper constructs a directional weighted network of investment in four major urban agglomerations in China - Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta and Chengdu-Chongqing - and describes the spatial structure and evolutionary characteristics The main conclusions of the study are as follows: During the evolution process from 2010 to 2019, the scale and density of the investment networks of the four major urban agglomerations show a certain growth trend. From the perspective of spatial pattern, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei shows a Shijiazhuang-Beijing-Tianjin From the perspective of spatial pattern, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei shows the inverted “V”-shaped structure of Shijiazhuang-Beijing-Tianjin, the Yangtze River Delta city cluster shows a multi-axis development with Shanghai as the core, the rhombus structure of Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Zhuhai-Foshan in the Pearl River Delta city cluster has been stabilized, and the Chengdu-Chongqing city cluster shows the spatial pattern of Chengdu and Chongqing with a double core and Chengdu with a single core. In terms of city level, the investment network pattern of the four major city clusters has a clear “core-edge” structure, but there is significant heterogeneity in the level differences of city nodes.

参考文献

[1] Harris C D, Ullman E L. The nature of cities[J]. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1945 (1): 7-17
[2] Beaver stock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. World-city network: A new met geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2000 (1):123-134
[3] 陆军,毛文峰.城市网络外部性的崛起:区域经济高质量一体化发展的新机制[J].经济学家,2020(12):62-70
[4] 杨亮洁,任娇杨,杨永春,等.尺度重构视角下中国城市多元网络结构研究[J].经济地理,2021(9):48-58
[5] Christaller W. Die zentralen Orte in Suddeutschland: Eine okonomisch-geographische Untersuchung uber die Gesetzmassigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit stadtischen Funktionen[J]. Jena, 1933
[6] 金凤君,王姣娥.20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性[J].地理学报,2004(2):293-302
[7] 解学梅.中小企业协同创新网络与创新绩效的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2010 (8):51-64
[8] Phelps N A, Fallon R J, Williams C L. Small firms, borrowed size and the urban-rural shift[J]. Regional Studies, 2001 (7): 613-624
[9] 曹清峰.协同创新推动区域协调发展的新机制研究——网络外部性视角[J].学习与实践,2019(10):32-41
[10] Capello R. The city network paradigm: Measuring urban network externalities[J]. Urban Studies, 2000(11): 1925-1945
[11] Cortinovis N, Van Oort F. Between spilling over and boiling down: Network-mediated spillovers, local knowledge base and productivity in European regions[J].Journal of Economic Geography, 2019(6): 1233-1260
[12] Meijers E J, Burger M J, Hoogerbrugge M M. Borrowing size in networks of cities: City size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2016(1): 181-198
[13] 姚士谋,张平宇,余成,等.中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J].地理科学,2014(6):641-647
[14] 方创琳.中国新型城镇化高质量发展的规律性与重点方向[J].地理研究,2019(1):13-22
[15] 任会明,叶明确,余运江.中国三大城市群金融网络空间结构与演化特征[J].经济地理,2021(12):63-73
[16] Hess M.Spatial relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness[J].Progress in Human Geography,2004(2):165-186
[17] 叶雅玲,林文盛,李振发,等.中国城市间投融资网络结构及其影响因素[J].世界地理研究,2020(2):307-316
[18] Yeung W C. The firm as social networks: An organizational perspective[J]. Growth and Change,2010(3):307-328
[19] Pan F, B W, Lenzer J, et al. Mapping urban networks through inter-firm service relationships: The case of China[J]. Urban Studies,2017(16):3639-3654
[20] Taylor P J, Derudder B, Faulconbridge J, et al. Advanced producer service firms as strategic networks, global cities as strate gic places[J]. Economic Geography,2014(3):267-291
[21] Martinus K, Sigler T J, Searle G, et al. Strategic globalizing centers and sub-network geometries: A social network analysis of multi-scalar energy networks[J]. Geoforum,2015(64):78-89
[22] Hoyler M, Watson A. Framing city networks through temporary projects:(Trans) national film production beyond “Global Hollywood” [J]. Urban Studies,2019(5):943-959
[23] 胡国建,陆玉麒,吴小影,等.基于企业间联系视角的长江经济带城市网络结构及其变化特征研究[J].人文地理,2021(2):146-154
[24] 王伟,张常明,王梦茹.中国三大城市群产业投资网络演化研究[J].城市发展研究,2018(11):118-124,161
[25] Amore M D, Bennedsen M. The value of local political connections in a low-corruption environment[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013(2): 387-402
[26] Cingano F, Pinotti P. Politicians at work: The private returns and social costs of political connections [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2013(2): 433-465
[27] 杨辉,尚智丛.微博科学传播机制的社会网络分析——以转基因食品议题为例[J].科学学研究,2015(3):337-346
[28] 赵健宇,袭希,苏屹.知识流动网络演化中小世界效应的仿真研究[J].管理评论,2015(5):70-81
[29] 唐明珠,曾坚,曾鹏.基于空间自相关与引力模型的闽三角城市群经济空间联系研究[J].现代城市研究,2020(10):68-74,104
[30] Harvey T. The Limits to Capital[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1982
文章导航

/

〈 〉