近年来,“韧性”问题逐渐成为国内外城市研究和政策实践领域关注的热点,而现有文献关于城市韧性构建模式的讨论尚未形成统一的认识。为更好推进中国现阶段城市韧性建设研究与实践,基于比较制度分析理论,通过全球代表性城市的多案例比较发现,城市韧性构建在不同制度条件下展现出不同的特点,政府与社会的关系是其核心区别。中国的“国家统合型”城市韧性建设模式是契合本国国情及本土制度环境的必然选择,同时也需要汲取他国城市韧性建设的有益经验,建设具有中国特色的韧性城市。
In recent years, “resilience” has gradually become a hot topic in urban research and policy practice at home and abroad. However, the study finds that there are objections to the construction model of urban resilience, and under the dual framework of “state-society”, they either tend to build a resilient order led by social self-organization, or emphasize the importance of good government governance, and some scholars propose that the construction of urban resilience needs to respect social and political differences. In order to better promote the construction of urban resilience in China at the current stage, based on comparative institutional analysis theory, through the comparison of multiple cases of representative cities around the world, it is found that the construction of urban resilience shows different characteristics under different institutional conditions, and the relationship between government and society is the core. China’s “national integration” urban resilience model is an inevitable result that adapts to our national conditions and institutional environment, but it also needs to absorb the useful experience of other countries’ urban resilience construction to build resilient cities with Chinese characteristics.
[1] Klein R J T, Nicholls R J, Thomalla F. Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? [J]. Environmental Hazards, 2003(5):35-45
[2] Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems [J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1978(4):1-23
[3] Waller M W. Resilience in ecosystemic context: Evolution of the concept[J]. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 2001(3):290-297
[4] The Rockefeller Foundation. “City Resilience Framework” [EB/OL]. (2015-01-30)[2021-11-21].https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/City-Resilience-Framework
[5] Comfort L K. Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response[M]. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 1999
[6] Davoudi S. Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? [J]. Planning Theory & Practice, 2012(2):299-333
[7] 杨光斌. 发现真实的“社会”——反思西方治理理论的本体论假设[J].中国社会科学评价, 2019(3):13-26
[8] Holling C S, Gunderson L H. Resilience and Adaptive Cycles[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2001
[9] Campanella T J. Urban resilience and the recovery of New Orleans[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2006(2):141-146
[10] Edwards C. Resilient Nation[M]. London: Demos, 2009
[11] Hein C, Schubert D. Resilience, disaster, and rebuilding in modern port cities[J]. Journal of Urban History, 2021(2):235-249
[12] Gimenez R, Labaka L, Hernantes J. Union means strength: Building city resilience through multi-stakeholder collaboration[J]. Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2018(26):385-393
[13] Dawley S, Pike A, Tomaney J. Towards the resilient region? Policy activism and peripheral region development [J]. Local Economy, 2010(8):1-16
[14] 仇保兴.基于复杂适应系统理论的韧性城市设计方法及原则[J].城市发展研究,2018(10):1-3
[15] 方东平,李在上,李楠,等. 城市韧性——基于“三度空间下系统的系统”的思考[J]. 土木工程学报,2017(7):1-7
[16] Eakin H, Bojórquez-Tapia L A, Janssen M A, et al. Urban resilience efforts must consider social and political forces[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017(2): 186-189
[17] Vale L, Campanella T. The Resilient City[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005
[18] 徐湘林.“国家治理”的理论内涵[J].人民论坛,2014(10):31
[19] 王浦劬,汤彬.当代中国治理的党政结构与功能机制分析[J].中国社会科学,2019(9):4-24
[20] 青木昌彦,曹莉,王信.比较制度分析:起因和一些初步的结论[J].经济社会体制比较,1997(1):1-7
[21] 热若尔·罗兰著,张帆译. 转型与经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002
[22] 青木昌彦著,张春霖译.政府在东亚经济发展中的作用[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1998
[23] Yingyi Q, Jiahua C. Institutional environment, community government, and corporate governance: Understanding China’s township-village enterprises[J]. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1998⑴:1-23
[24] 托克维尔著,董果良译,论美国的民主[M].北京:商务印书馆,2017
[25] 松下圭一著,市民政治理论の形成[M].东京:岩波书店,1959
[26] 潘维. 中国模式:解读人民共和国的60年[M]. 北京:中央编译出版社,2009
[27] 李路曲.新加坡道路[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2018
[28] 陶希东. 韧性城市:内涵认知、国际经验与中国策略[J].学术前沿,2022(6):79-89
[29] 邵亦文,徐江.城市规划中实现韧性构建:日本强韧化规划对中国的启示[J].城市与减灾,2017(7):71-76
[30] 邦城规划,在气候变化危机中建立“韧性城市”[N/OL].[2022-11-12].http://cn.scpc.cc/page.aspx?s=cn&cid=19&id=1492
[31] 佩里·安德森著,郭方译.从古代到封建主义的过渡[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000
[32] 霍布斯著,黎思复,黎廷弼译.利维坦[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985
[33] 唐士其.治理与国家权力的边界——理论梳理与反思[J]. 湖北行政学院学报, 2018(6):29-33
[34] 哈耶克著, 冯克利等译.致命的自负[M]. 北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000
[35] 海伍德著,张立鹏译.政治学 (第二版) [M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013
[36] 陈进华.治理体系现代化的国家逻辑[J].中国社会科学,2019(5):23-39
[37] 苏力.大国制宪:历史中国的制度构成[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2018
[38] 褚松燕. 从全能主义到权能主义——改革开放以来中国政治发展变迁的一种解释框架[J].中央社会主义学院学报,2018(4):40-45
[39] 陈明明.中国政府原理的集权之维:历史与现代化[J].公共管理与政策评论,2021(1):6-20
[40] 罗传芳.新加坡的选择:现代民主的西方模式,还是传统儒家的东亚模式? [EB/OL].(2015-03-23)[2022-09-12].https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_1313738
[41] 莽景石.温和的威权主义、收入分配平等与国家治理——日本的案例分析[J].日本学刊,2014 (6):78-92
[42] 福武直.大众社会[M]. 广州:广东人民出版,1982
[43] 汪仕凯.党和国家机构改革与政治体制能力重塑:制度优势转化为治理效能的中国逻辑[J].南京社会科学,2020 (2):1-9
[44] 任剑涛. 找回国家:全球治理中的国家凯旋[J].探索与争鸣,2020(3):26-41
[45] Raquel G, Leire L,Josune H. Union means strength: Building city resilience through multistakeholder collaboration[J]. Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2018(26):385-393
[46] 林红. 当代民粹主义的两极化趋势及其制度根源[J].国际政治研究,2017(1):19-21
[47] 鲍勃·杰索普. 治理的兴起及其失败的风险:以经济发展为例的论述[J].国际社会科学杂志(中文版),1999(1):31-48.
[48] 田晓虹.从日本“町内会”的走向看国家与社会关系演变的东亚路径[J].社会科学,2004(2):64-72
[49] 胡那苏图,崔月琴.建构协同:政府与社会组织的关系研究——基于日本3个城市的文本分析[J].社会工作,2021 (1):90-103
[50] 乌尔里希·贝克著,何博闻译. 风险社会[M], 上海:译林出版社,2004
[51] 单菁菁.我国城市化进程中的脆弱性分析[J].工程研究—跨学科视野中的工程,2011 (3):240-248
[52] Churchman C. Wicked problems[J]. Management Science, 1967(4):141-142
[53] 黄相怀.中国道路与人类现代化经验:基于“使命型政党”视角的考察[J].江海学刊,2020(4):137-142
